support or refute Andrew Jackson's claim the Indian removal was done in the best interest of American Indians
1 answer:
I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits , such as:
It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u> It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border. In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to :
<u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state. Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc). As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
You might be interested in
Answer: their dependency on slave trade and domination of slave trade (caused by waging war)
Explanation: trust me
What are the choices? Comment those and Ill give you the answer :)
<span>to ask Lyndon Johnson to run for governor of Texas in the upcoming election </span>
During 1931-1945(world war 2) japan became to build up and later went to war with the united states (August 1941 The Battle of Pearl Harbor) hope this help
What was one feature of the united states economy during the 920s that contributed to the great depression syvum? A: E<span>xpansion of easy credit</span>