support or refute Andrew Jackson's claim the Indian removal was done in the best interest of American Indians
1 answer:
I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits , such as:
It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u> It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border. In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to :
<u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state. Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc). As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
You might be interested in
Answer:
6 months po
Explanation:
hope it help to you
Answer:
Despite continuing commercial links between the United States and the Soviet Union throughout the 1920s, Wilson’s successors upheld his policy of nonrecognition. Roosevelt hoped that recognition of the Soviet Union would serve U.S. strategic interests by limiting Japanese expansionism in the Far East.
Explanation:
They trapped by European sea power south <span>land power of ottomans west.</span>
Answer:
Great Britain
Explanation: