
When 0 is in the numerator, then the whole fraction becomes equal to 0.
However if 0 is in the denominator, then it is undefined.
They aren't equivalent
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
In order to determine whether the expression:

is equivalent to:

Genevieve needs to follow these steps:
Step 1. Get rid parentheses

Step 2. Combine like terms

Step 3. Solve

So:

Therefore, these two expressions aren't equivalent.
<h2>Learn more:</h2>
Writing expressions: brainly.com/question/13894833#
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
$49.60
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation setup I used for this was as follows: $16 x (112/36)
Using PEMDAS, you'd start with the division part, 112/36. Although, I did this a bit differently, and being a bit further in school, I don't know if you go through this where you're at.
Start by factoring 112 into 4(28). This leaves you with 4(28)/36.
Next, cancel 4 out of 36. Since 4 is the common factor in 28 and 36, you cancel the four out of the equation, leaving you with 28/9. Convert this to its decimal form, 3.1.
Finally, take the 3.1 and multiply that by $16, which comes out to $49.60.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Since the <em>rate</em><em> </em><em>of change</em><em> </em>[<em>slope</em>] is zero, that automatically makes our equation set equal to the y-coordinate of the ordered pair, which in this case is the y-intercept.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
4 x (3+6) = 12 + 24 ---->Distributive
3 + ( 8 + 2) = 3 + (2 + 8) ---> Commutative
6 x (7 x 3 ) = (6 x 7 ) x 3 --->Associative