Answer:
99 F
Step-by-step explanation:
"Three lower" means it was the original temperature - 3, so if the original temperature was 102, we have the equation:
102 - 3
99 F
so 99 F is the answer
Answer:
A. 
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation in slope-intercept form, 
, can be created to be used in finding Jack's pay. We need to find the slope (m) and the y-intercept (b) of the linear function.
Using two points (1, 18), and (1.5, 23), find the slope (m):
Slope (m) = 
Find b, by substituting x = 1, f(x) = 18, and m = 10 into .
Subtract 10 from each side
Substitute m = 10 and b = 8 into .
✅Thus, the linear function that can be used to find Jack's pay would be:
Answer:
B. 15"
Step-by-step explanation:
What are we supposed to solved X or Y, what kind of answer need be for specific please
There is not enough information to calculate this.
<span>Knowing the weight ratio of the fox to coyote as 3:8 in no way allows you to know the respective ratio of the wolf. To know the weight of the wolf would require knowing its ratio value, then the weights of all 3 is an easy calculation. </span>
<span>Example - 3:8:15 (f:c:w) is a plausible ratio based upon real-world weight averages for certain species/subspecies of the three. </span>
<span>- knowing the values of the 3 terms as 3:8:15 gives a total of 3+8+15 = 26 ratio values </span>
<span>- you then simply divide the total weight by this ratio value total; 120/26 = 4.62 </span>
<span>- so each ratio value is 4.62 units of weight*** </span>
<span>- now, simply calculate the weight of each canid by multiplying its ratio value by the unit of weight... </span>
<span>fox; 3 x 4.62 = 13.86 </span>
<span>coyote; 8 x 4.62 = 36.96 </span>
<span>wolf; 15 x 4.62 = 69.3 </span>
<span>Validate the ratios by adding the weights together (we should get 120) 13.86 + 36.96 + 69.3 = 120.12 </span>
<span>The total is slightly out because that 4.62 figure was a rounding up. </span>
<span>Now, the thing is, there is nothing given that allows us to know exactly what ratio value the wolf should be, I chose 15 myself because that is a real-world plausible value when compared to 3:8 for the other 2. Changing it to 16, say, means that there are now 27 ratio values total giving a ratio value of 120/27 = 4.44 obviously changing the weights of all 3.</span>
