Answer:
A. population sizes, income levels and cultural influences, the current state of the infrastructure and distribution and retail networks available.
Explanation:
The reason is that the foreign markets are affected by the cultural differences for example if US clothing brand enters Suadia Arabia then it can not sell its brands here because in the Suadia Arabian culture girls wear full sleeves and are not skin tight fits. This means that the culture have an influence over the foreign markets. Likewise the income level tells about how much the customer can spend on luxury items, population of customers available is also an attractive part that the investors see to move in the markets. The infrastructure of a country and the regional importance of the state are also the motivators for the foreign companies to move in to the market.
These factors are the ecosystem of the country that gives insight of the market size and market growth of a particular market.
Answer:
Explanation: Keep it to One Page. This is a biggie!
Avoid Spelling or Grammar Errors.
Watch Your Tenses.
Avoid the First Person Pronouns.
Make Sure It's Easy to Read.
Answer:
b. False
Explanation:
LIFO stand for Last in First Out. This means LIFO inventory valuation is based on earlier goods purchased.
So, when costs are decreasing, they are affecting latter prices and this usually affect FIFO (First in First Out) not LIFO.
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
Hey I think A production–possibility frontier or production possibility curve is a curve which shows various combinations of set of two goods which can be produced with the given resources and technology where the given resources are fully and efficiently utilised per unit time
