Answer :
AgI should precipitate first.
The concentration of
when CuI just begins to precipitate is, 
Percent of
remains is, 0.0076 %
Explanation :
for CuI is 
for AgI is 
As we know that these two salts would both dissociate in the same way. So, we can say that as the Ksp value of AgI has a smaller than CuI then AgI should precipitate first.
Now we have to calculate the concentration of iodide ion.
The solubility equilibrium reaction will be:

The expression for solubility constant for this reaction will be,
![K_{sp}=[Cu^+][I^-]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%3D%5BCu%5E%2B%5D%5BI%5E-%5D)
![1\times 10^{-12}=0.0079\times [I^-]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-12%7D%3D0.0079%5Ctimes%20%5BI%5E-%5D)
![[I^-]=1.25\times 10^{-10}M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BI%5E-%5D%3D1.25%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-10%7DM)
Now we have to calculate the concentration of silver ion.
The solubility equilibrium reaction will be:

The expression for solubility constant for this reaction will be,
![K_{sp}=[Ag^+][I^-]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%3D%5BAg%5E%2B%5D%5BI%5E-%5D)
![8.3\times 10^{-17}=[Ag^+]\times 1.25\times 10^{-10}M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=8.3%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-17%7D%3D%5BAg%5E%2B%5D%5Ctimes%201.25%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-10%7DM)
![[Ag^+]=6.64\times 10^{-7}M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BAg%5E%2B%5D%3D6.64%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-7%7DM)
Now we have to calculate the percent of
remains in solution at this point.
Percent of
remains = 
Percent of
remains = 0.0076 %
Yes the answer is 1s22s22p63s23p64s23d5
Answer:
0.00735°C
Explanation:
By seeing the question, we can see the elevation in boiling point with addition of BaCl₂ in water
⠀

⠀
⠀
<u>The</u><u> </u><u>elevation</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>boiling</u><u> </u><u>point</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>phenomenon</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>which</u><u> </u><u>there</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>increase</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>boiling</u><u> </u><u>point</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>solution</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>when</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>particular</u><u> </u><u>type</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>solute</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>added</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>pure</u><u> </u><u>solvent</u><u>.</u>
⠀
⠀

⠀
⠀
Where 'i' is van't hoff factor which represents the ratio of observed osmotic pressure and the value to be expected.
and 'i' is 3 (as given in the question)
⠀
'Kb' is molal boiling point constant. And it's value is 0.51°C/mol(given in question)
⠀
'm' represent the molality of solution. Molatity is no. of moles of solution present in 1kg of solution.
⠀
⠀
<u>To</u><u> </u><u>find</u><u> </u><u>molality</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>we</u><u> </u><u>have</u><u> </u><u>to</u><u> </u><u>divide</u><u> </u><u>no</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>moles</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>solute</u><u> </u><u>by</u><u> </u><u>weight</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>solution</u>
⠀
While first we need to no. of moles

⠀
⠀
<u>Now</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>we</u><u> </u><u>will</u><u> </u><u>find</u><u> </u><u>molality</u>
⠀

⠀
⠀

⠀

⠀
⠀
⠀
<u>Henceforth</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>change</u><u> </u><u>in</u><u> </u><u>boiling</u><u> </u><u>point</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>0</u><u>.</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u>7</u><u>3</u><u>5</u><u>°</u><u>C</u><u>.</u>
Answer:
Dark matter makes up 85% of the mass of the universe. Dark matter is not directly observable because it doesn't interact with any electromagnetic wave. In the development of the universe, without dark matter, the universe will not function, move or rotate as it does now (this speculation led to the quest to find the anomaly of mass and energy in the known universe, eventually leading to the idealization of dark matter) and will not have enough gravitational force to hold it together. After the big bang,<em> the presence of dark matter and energy ensured that the newly formed universe didn't just float away, rather, it provided enough gravitational force to hold the universe while still allowing it to expand sufficiently</em>.
The development of the universe would have been different without the universe in the sense that the young universe won't have enough mass to hold it together, and the universe would have simply floated apart. The behavior of the universe would have been different from what we observe now, and some physical laws that applies now will not apply to the universe.
the degree or intensity of heat present in a substance or object, especially as expressed according to a comparative scale and shown by a thermometer or perceived by touch. So I would have to go with A.