Help ASAP only right answers only no spam don’t answer if you don’t know
Important usd
Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
Answer:
I think its 25 (proceed with caution)
Step-by-step explanation:
15×4=60 so basically 6.25×4=25
6.25 = 6 1/4
The answer is -21.4
Hope that answers your question ;)
Answer:
x > -18
Step-by-step explanation:
10 ( x - 9 ) > -270
Treat the inequality like an equation,
Distribute first:
10 ( x - 9 ) > - 270
10x - 90 > -270
Inverse operations:
10x - 90 > -270
+90 +90
10x > -180
/10 /10
x > -18
