Callaway golf company conducted a one-time survey of golfers and asked them about their attitudes, preferences, and intentions regarding buying custom clubs. this is an example of a(n) "cross-sectional study".
<h3>What is cross-sectional study?</h3>
A cross-sectional study examines data from a group of people at one point in time. Participants throughout this type of research are chosen based on certain variables of interest.
Some key features of cross-sectional study are-
- Cross-sectional studies are common in psychology, but they are also employed in many other fields, such as social science and innovation.
- Cross-sectional studies is observational in nature but are classified as descriptive research rather than causal or relational research, which means they cannot be used to pinpoint the source about something, such as a sickness.
- Researchers collect information from a population, yet they do not change variables.
- This strategy is frequently used to draw conclusions about potential links or to collect early data to enable additional research and experimentation.
To know more about the cross-sectional study, here
brainly.com/question/14557972
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is: Both parties could win, depending if there were other conditions established for the auction.
Explanation:
Usually when an auction is carried out there are conditions established beforehand by the auctioneer that must be fulfilled in order for the sale to be completed.
In this case, since we don´t know what other conditions the town of Sanford included in the auction, if any other condition at all, we can´t conclude which party could win the lawsuit. For instance if a reserve was required but Arthur and Arlene didn´t do the reserve deposit, then they will obviously lose. The same happens with other established conditions like a minimum price set, etc. But if no other condition established, then Arthur and Arlene could win.
Answer:
my mind is blank. how is even an adult supposed to answer this. i read it and it makes no sense. pls rethink before u send ok?
just a top tip for u
Explanation:
Answer:
Fair Credit Reporting Act is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
32%
Explanation:
Since the question, it is mentioned that Mr. Seider owns 32% of the outstanding common stock of Greenfield Corporation. And, he also received the stock dividend of 10%.
But after the stock dividend, the ownership would remain the same i.e 32% because the dividend is based on the ownership criteria. As the dividend is distributed on the number of shares owned by the shareholder. So, the ownership would be 32% after the stock dividend
