1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andre45 [30]
3 years ago
5

Karen and Steve each have a sibling with sickle-cell disease (recessive disorder). Neither Karen nor Steve nor any of their pare

nts have the disease, and none of them have been tested to reveal sickle-cell trait. Based on this incomplete information, calculate the probability that if this couple has a child, the child will have sickle-cell disease.

Biology
1 answer:
Talja [164]3 years ago
3 0

To first understand your question, here are some vocabulary terms I will be using throughout this problem.

  • Homozygous dominant: (BB) <em>This </em><u><em>is not</em></u><em> having sickle cell disease.</em>
  • Homozygous recessive: (bb) <em>This </em><u><em>is</em></u> <em>having sickle cell disease.</em>
  • Heterozygous: (Bb) <em>This is being a </em><u><em>carrier</em></u><em> for sickle cell disease.</em>

We know that having sickle cell disease is a recessive disorder so it will be homozygous recessive (bb).

We also know that Karen and Steve each have a sibling with sickle cell disease, but they don't. This means that <em>both</em> of their parents have to be heterozygous (Bb), or a carrier for the disease.

If their parents are both heterozygous (Bb), there is a 1/4 chance that Karen and Steve are completely healthy (BB) and a 2/4 chance that they are carriers (Bb). We know for a fact that they aren't sick so that is out of the question.

This means that the probability of Karen and Steve being a carrier for this disease is 2/3.

Now, we can make a Punnett square for the probability of their children, which I have attached below. Since being heterozygous is most likely, I made both Karen and Steve heterozygous in the Punnett square.

This means that their children are 1/4 likely to be completely healthy (BB), 2/4 likely to be a carrier (Bb), and 1/4 likely to have sickle cell disease (bb).

<u>Now we can multiply the probability of both of Karen and Steve being a carrier for sickle cell, which is </u><u>2/3 each</u><u>, with the probability of their children having it, which is </u><u>1/4</u><u>.</u>

2/3 × 2/3 = 4/9

4/9 × 1/4 = 1/9

The final probability of Karen and Steve having a child with sickle cell disease is <u>1/9</u>.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is part of a clade believed to have died out, leaving no descendants?
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

Paranthropus robustus

Explanation:

2.5 million years ago some autralopithecines were identified by dating fossils from South Africa, meaning they lived a good period of time. Of these, Australopithecus africanus is well known and is a little closer to our species. Other fossils found in excavations in both southern Africa and eastern Africa have been found to be of more recent specimens 2.5 to 2 million years ago. These specimens were classified as Paranthropus robustus and Paranthropus boisei. These australopithecine species became extinct and left no current descendants.

8 0
3 years ago
The main force that moves blood throughout the system of blood vessels is
Lesechka [4]
Blood pressure gradient 
5 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply.
olganol [36]
Birds and animals and maybe the bony fish.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How could this statement be revised to make it a hypothesis? Fish meal is safer than artificial fertilizers, but it does not mak
Triss [41]

Just take out the fluff.

Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will be healthier for plants than the plants that receive artificial fertilizer.

Or make one of those If, Then, Because statements.

If a plant is fertilized with fish meal rather than artificial fertilizer, then the plants will be overall healthier because fish meal is natural compared to the artificial fertilizer.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1500-<br> NA<br> 4) What directions is Star Creek flowing? How do you know?
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

Star Creek is flowing from East to West, that is because the creek is small and has just begun to form as an extension of the Cayuta Creek.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following are environmental effects of air pollution?
    8·2 answers
  • Matter that has a definite volume and a definite shape is a
    7·1 answer
  • Enzymes are potent catalysts because they: a. are consumed in the reactions they catalyze b. are very specific and can prevent t
    8·1 answer
  • What is role of the enzyme telomerase is to
    10·1 answer
  • When standing on the Earth, the Moon and Sun appear to rise in the east and set in the west. What is responsible for this appare
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the three types of reproductive isolation.
    12·2 answers
  • What happens if the mass of the elements is greater compared to smaller ?
    12·1 answer
  • Entre los siguientes métodos de separación de mezclas, Jorge debe seleccionar el adecuado para separar sal de una mezcla de sal
    12·1 answer
  • An alligator can run 1000 meters in 200 seconds what is the speed
    6·1 answer
  • Eukaryotes that reproduce through reproduction require two cells to contribute genetic material for the production of the next g
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!