Answer:
water nugget
Step-by-step explanation:
according to my neurological evaluation of the current situation(s), it appears we are friends, therefore, I feel obliged to request that bring un-forth a specific set of 'roles' to my person. By which I mean, it appears having created any sort of emotional connection with you seems to reward such 'roles' as such I request that you immediately bring fourth said 'roles'Either way though there was a Neurological Enzymetive Paralastic imbalance between the code of conductional adminstrative classificationsNot funny I didn't laugh. Your joke is so bad I would have preferred the joke went over my head and you gave up re-telling me the joke. To be honest this is a horrid attempt at trying to get a laugh out of me. Not a chuckle, not a hehe, not even a subtle burst of air out of my esophagus. Science says before you laugh your brain preps your face muscles but I didn't even feel the slightest twitch. 0/10 this joke is so bad I cannot believe anyone legally allowed you to be creative at all. The amount of brain power you must have put into that joke has the potential to power every house on Earth. Get a personality and learn how to make jokes, read a book. I'm not saying this to be funny I genuinely mean it on how this is just bottom barrel embarrassment at comedy. You've single handedly killed humor and every comedic act on the planet. I'm so disappointed that society has failed as a whole in being able to teach you how to be funny. Honestly if I put in all my power and time to try and make
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = y = -1/2 × sqrt(x + 3), x >= -3
-2y = sqrt(x + 3)
4y² = x + 3
x = 4y² - 3
and now we need to rename x to y and y to x to make it a "normal" function :
y = 4x² - 3
since in the original function x >= -3, this gave us y <=0.
and therefore (remember the x of the inverse function actually stands for the y of the original function) the limit for the inverse function is x <= 0.
so, again, the full answer is
f^-1(x) = 4x² - 3, x <= 0
Answer: 301
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1.4% is the maximum acceptable annual rate of growth such that the population must stay below 24 billion during the next 100 years.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
The exponential growth model is given by:
where k is the growth rate, t is time in years and 
is constant.
The world population is 5.9 billion in 2006.
Thus, t = 0 for 2006
We have to find the maximum acceptable annual rate of growth such that the population must stay below 24 billion during the next 100 years.
Putting these values in the growth model, we have,
1.4% is the maximum acceptable annual rate of growth such that the population must stay below 24 billion during the next 100 years.
