A. Bid/no bid decision
A "bid" is what contractors call their proposals, and in some cases it will not be worth it to even submit a proposal on a job. The stage where contractors decide if it is worth it is called bid/no-bid.
Answer:
The monarchs continued to challenge Parliament's authority.
Explanation:
Following the English Civil War, tensions between the monarchs and Parliament began to grow. Queen Elizabeth did not leave any heir, therefore, James I began the Stuart Dynasty. James I believed in Divine Rule, which was in oppose of Queen Elizabeth's rule who worked with Parliament.
After the English Civil War, the monarchs continues to challenge Parliament's authority. During Restoration monarchs, Charles II and James II, Parliament and monarchs were in conflict with each other.
Therefore, option C is correct.
Answer:
$1,094.50
Explanation:
Regular pay is $20.50
Over time pay is $20.50 x 1.5 = $30.75
Tommy earned as follows.
Regular hours : 40 x $20.50 = $820
Overtime hours: 9 x $30.75 =$274.50
Total amount earned
= $820 + $274.50
=$1,094.50
you have 30 minutes to complete this assignment. SHOW YOUR WORK OR YOU GET NO CREDIT. I will not be here Monday. you quizizz code is on canvas.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
