Answer: The misappropriation theory
Explanation:
The misappropriation theory is basically describe about the various types of security fraud violation against the data source.
It is basically uses for the insider trading and when the individual person misusing the confidential data or information and also violating all the securities laws.
According to the question, the given argument is basically describe about the misappropriation theory.
Therefore, The misappropriation theory is the correct answer.
Answer:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Explanation:
The name of the act was given because of the two leaders who jointly worked together to regain the trust of potential investors in the financial system. The act discussed the auditing requirements, directors roles and responsibilities and the signing of the annual report by the directors as well and also that the CFO and CEO will form an opinion about the firms future, goals and giving the undertaking that the financial statement are accurate according to their knwoledge.
Under mandatory bargaining requirements, the union must apply the terms of contract equally to all bargaining-unit employees. There are different subjects that are available and open for bargaining. Salary, benefits, contract and employment terms are all types of subjects that an employee can bargin to get what they want even if it's not initally offered. All mandatory subects directly impact an employees terms and conditions in a company.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice. The direct result of the problems is that <span>less city workers to plow the streets causing an increase in the number of car accidents during the winter months. </span>I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Answer: (E) none of the other choices
Explanation:
None of the options are correct in the above question.
The USA extends Most Favoured Nation Status to most countries in the world including Germany so that would not be a reason for the car's not to pass through customs.
The cars could indeed be a threat to national security. Just because they come from a safe country does not mean that they were not tampered with. They need to be properly inspected.
They are indeed a source of competition for US automakers but that would be no reason to stop them. Perhaps tariffs could be applied on them but they will not be stopped.
There is no provision in US Customs practices that prohibits the importation of used cars solely because they are used cars therefore it will not be a reason to halt the car's going through customs.
None of the options are therefore correct.
