There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
Answer:
As consumer phycology is the study of how or why people buy things or goods, it is a useful tool to seek what are the patterns that potential customers are likely to follow aiming to sell the bank services such as bank runs.
Explanation:
By using the influence of marketing, and external stimuli to convince possible clients to purchase, based on studies and their findings, which can help banks marketing executives to figure out how to sell the product or what is the most likely population to work on based on their preferences in order to offer different options to the costumers that can adapt to their needs.
With regards to whether one needs to memorize information a second time for recognition to occur, this is a<u> False statement. </u>
Recognition:
- Occurs after one memorizes information for the first time
- Requires that one accesses information that they already have
When one recognizes something, it is because they have already memorized it at least once before. They will then access that memory when stimulated and this is why they would then recognize the thing in question.
In conclusion, the statement given above is true.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/19648449. </em>
Answer: Cultural diversity
Explanation: The existence of differences or distinct customs, behavior, attitude within a certain group, society or community is referred to as cultural diversity. One may expect that chimpanzees should all have the same attribute, custom usually called monoculture, However, this is not usually the case, differences may exist within a group even though they possess similar physical build or outlook. Differences in greeting, religious ritual, cultural sentiment, grooming and so on make up differences between groups within a society, which is reffered to as diversity in culture.
