The main two regions of the United States that were the centers for industry and manufacturing during the Second Industrial Revolution were the NorthEast and Midwest
Answer:
The living conditions in the cities and towns were miserable and characterized by: overcrowding, poor sanitation, spread of diseases, and pollution.
Explanation:
The answer is, "A", "<span>Hosni Mubarak".</span>
Answer:
they believed that it would heal the wounds of their childhood and early youth.
Explanation:
Since very young age, Maschmann was indoctrinated about Germany’s defeat in the First World War and the hardships and humiliation her country faced after the war.
So when she grew up, she developed a sense of partriotism towards her country and believed that it was her duty to take all measures to reclaim her country's honor.
Similarly, many young people like her felt that living and working for "colonisation work” in “advanced posts” like Warthegau was an opportunity to give back to their country as well.
Therefore, the thought of living and working in the Warthegau seemed appealing to Maschmann and other young people because they believed that it would heal the wounds of their childhood and early youth.
I am going to assume here you are referring to the 'Scramble of Africa' that happened in the second half of the 19th century, as the European power did not really control the African regions before then.
The methods contexts did differ per colonising power and colonised region, but it boils down to the following factors:
- superior firepower, equipment and recourses; having better guns, armour, communication technology, and supply routes, made the Europeans a formidable enemy that the various tribes simply could not counter.
- co-opting the local elites; a tried and tested method for centuries, this has always been the way smart conquerers could maintain control over a region with minimal fuss and expenditur.
<span>- divide and conquer; conflict between the many tribes of Africa has been a constant for centuries in the continent. The Europeans could easily manipulate the various tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from rising up. </span>
<span>- a willingness to use extreme forms of terror; the Europeans might have been all high and mighty back home about their Enlightment and democracy, but in Africa they were more than willing to use forms of terror that would make most contemporary dictators feel a little uneasy. Case in point, the widespread killing and mutilation when quotas were not met in king Leopold II's Congo.</span>
