All categories

3 years ago

In which of the following conflicts would the U.S. intervene according to the Powell Doctrine?

History

1 answer:

yulyashka [42]3 years ago

8 0

B. a country is harboring terrorists responsible for attacks on the U.S.

Explanation:

The Powell Doctrine is a term that is used for a policy that is primarily focused on defense of the country and preventing attacks on the country, usually by using military force. In order for a military attack to be approved though numerous things have to be taken in consideration, examined, and answered.

From the presented scenarios, the Powell Doctrine would enable the U.S. the intervene in a country is harboring terrorists responsible for attacks on the U.S. Such examples in the past few decades have been the war in Afghanistan because of Al-Qaeda, and the war in Iraq, also because of Al-Qaeda. A military intervention also occurred in Iraq and the neighboring Syria because of the rise of the terrorist organization ISIS among other reasons.

You might be interested in

What is the basic premise of an opportunity cost? Question 1 options: When you buy something, you are foregoing all the other th

viva [34]

Answer:

When you buy something, you are foregoing all the other things you could have bought instead.

Explanation:

Opportunity cost is an economic concept that refers to the cost of giving up certain factors as a result of choosing a specific factor. In a simpler way, we can say that this concept refers to a situation, where an individual must choose a factor for a certain objective to be achieved, but the choice of that factor forces the individual to give up other factors.

An example of this can be seen when a person has to choose between buying a new sofa and running out of money to change the garage floor, or changing the garage floor, but running out of money to buy the new sofa.

6 0

3 years ago

What was an effect of the increased farm mechanization in the south that began in the 1960s?

JulijaS [17]

Farm workers lost their jobs.
Farmers could have more land under cultivation.
Unemployed farm workers moved into cities.

8 0

3 years ago

In what ways was English policy toward Native Americans different from those of France and Spain?

Nana76 [90]

Answer:

The differences in their policy can be found in their differences which are;

The French and Spanish Colonist were in the Americas to get riches of gold silver and fur, while the English were in America for Religious freedom and land

Explanation:

The differences in the English and French policy towards the Native Americans are;

1) English saw the Native Americans as trade and survival partners

2) The population of the English was larger

3) Contested for land

The differences in the English and Spanish policy towards the Native Americans are;

1) They respected the Indians

2) They did not view them as ideal for soldiers conquest or bringing them under their military control.

8 0

3 years ago

The term “civil” refers to the private rights of citizens.<br><br> True or false

Fudgin [204]

True
......................................

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did Harry Truman's presidency impact the civil rights of African-Americans during the late 1940's and early 1950's? A) Durin

love history [14]

Answer: C) African-Americans experienced an improved level of civil rights, including the desegregation of the military and the federal government.

The presidency of Harry S Truman saw a lot of improvement to the civil rights of African Americans. The president established the President's Committee on Civil Rights which was tasked with examining the condition of civil rights in the United States.

President Truman, based on their recommendations, signed executive orders 9980 and 9981. These ordered the desegregation of the federal work force and of the armed forces.

5 0

3 years ago