Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
<span>External users are people outside the business entity (organization) who use accounting information. Examples of external users are suppliers, banks, customers, investors, potential investors, and tax authorities.</span>
Answer:
<u>Letter B is correct</u>. Diversification.
Explanation:
Diversification in this case is the best option for an investor with this profile. This is because in the passive approach it is considered the price fluctuation information of a stock and the history of its current and future earnings. Therefore, diversification is ideal for this type of investor, because diversifying investments reduces the risk of losses.
The study of an agent's or individual's decisions is known as decision theory. The official decision-making process concludes with evaluation. Evaluating the consequences may assist the decision-maker in learning lessons that will help her make better decisions in the future.
- Loss aversion is the correct answer because the general notion of the "loss-aversion" theory is that if an individual is provided with two equal alternatives, one of which is presented in terms of prospective profits and the other in terms of potential losses, the former option will be chosen.
- Loss aversion is a cognitive bias or psychological phenomenon that explains why the agony of losing is twice as powerful psychologically as the pleasure of winning.
Therefore, representativeness, cognitive bias, and overconfidence are not factors relative to an arbitrary decision distortion. So, Loss aversion is the correct response to the question.
For more information regarding arbitrary baseline, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/11224360