Answer:
$45,473
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, we can use this method to solve the problem.
Solution:
$42,000 + $4,960 – $1,100 – ($1,830 – $1,380) + ($381 – $318)
= $46,960- $,1,100-$450-$63
=$45,473
As our answer
Jenna used the vendor bid analysis
.
Option D
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Vendor Bid Analysis is the tool of evaluating the proposals received by many suppliers to determine the cost of such a project. This can be done by taking into account the risk provided for project works (through quotations, deals, proposals, etc.).
The buyer's side can take account of documents from existing agreements, meeting qualitative needs, capability and infrastructure, establishing time limits for records, financial capacity, and services when analyzing the offers of a good or service.
This is not an official offer to purchase the property, but rather a public declaration that the seller isn't satisfied with the last offer which is used to keep the deal on track.
<span>Answer: Expectancy. Because Caron did not accept the extra project since the pay for completing was ten lottery tickets. The pay is characterized by chance.</span>
To be more professional in a business sense. If I am the president of a bank I want to be classical and professional. I change with my title.
