whaatt? um me? ._. is this even a question?
<span>The business implemented RFID as a way of tracking inventory. Using radio frequency made it easier to track and store inventory without running the risk of over- or under-ordering their products. This makes sure that the inventory is properly tagged and that the turnover rates on the products are properly logged. It also makes sure that the products do get turned over, instead of being left to waste in the stockroom due to errors on the part of the stock crew.</span>
Answer:
The answer is: $4,522
Explanation:
Since Stanford doesn't operate in the restaurant business and doesn't buy the restaurant, he cannot deduct any amount for investigation costs relating to the restaurant.
Stanford doesn't operate in the bakery business but he bought the bakery, so he can deduct up to $5,000 (before amortization) for investigation costs related to the bakery. But those $5,000 are reduced by every dollar he spent over $50,000, so he can only deduct $4,000 [= $5,000 - ($51,000 - $50,000)].
The remaining $47,000 (= $51,000 - $4,000) can be amortized over 180 months, which equals $261 per month (= $47,000 / 180 months).
Since he bought the restaurant in November, he can deduct two months: $261 per month x 2 months = $522
So his total deduction for investigation expenses is = $4,000 + $522 = $4,522
The answer should be 1. Focus on selling to foreign countries.
This is because the article stated that the POD business had a lot more awareness on foreign sales production. They had tons of customers with 20% of their profit coming from Norway, and the rate keeps rising by year 3.
Foreign selling creates product awarness with more people being able to buy the product if overseas, making more profit from more people buying. If it were just sold in the U.S, for example, then not as many people could buy the cars, but foreign production can reach out to MANY more people.
