1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuliya22 [10]
4 years ago
15

Which of the following would not be an expected response from a decrease in the price level and so help to explain the slope of

the aggregate-demand curve? a. With prices down and wages fixed by contract, Fargo Concrete Company decides to lay off workers. b. Tyler feels wealthier because of the price-level decrease and so he decides to remodel his kitchen. c. When interest rates fall, In-and-Out Convenience Stores decides to build some new stores. d. The exchange rate falls, so French restaurants in Paris buy more Kansas beef.
Business
1 answer:
Naddik [55]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct option which would not be an expected response from decrease in price level is A) with fall in prices, Fargo concrete company has decided to let go workers who have fixed price contracts.

Explanation:

All the options except A are expected response from the fall in price and helps in explaining why the aggregate demand curve shifted ( towards the right ) . In the option B , Tyler decided to remodel his kitchen because of fall in prices, as now he is able to spend more on consumption and investment activities. Same thing is happening in option C and D as the company's here are increasing their investment spending due to the decreased prices.

But the option A , isn't something that was expected as company's don't usually fire their workers just because they have fixed price wage contract and prices have fallen, company is trying to take advantage of fallen prices by  reducing the fixed wage workers and hiring new workers on a cheap wage , which help in reducing the company's cost.

You might be interested in
Given the following transaction: Purchased supplies for office use on credit.
zysi [14]
Whats the rest of the question??
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Case Problem Analysis: Jurisdiction
Natali5045456 [20]

There are different kinds of cases. The answers to the questions are blow.

  • Before any court can hear any dispute between Miriam and the trucking company, it must have the jurisdiction to do so.

  • In order for Marya to sue the trucking firm, she has to file the lawsuit in a court that also has personal jurisdiction over the <u>Defendant</u>.

  • Georgia and Florida have personal jurisdiction over the trucking firm?

Yes, Marya sue the trucking firm in Georgia and Florida state courts.

Miriam would likely NOT want to sue the trucking firm in Georgia because she would need to;

  • Get a lawyer in  Georgia
  • Make multiple trips to Georgia
  • Have witnesses travel to Georgia.

Miriam would likely want to sue the trucking firm in Florida because:

1. The court is closer to her home

2.  She can better research for local lawyers

  • Miriam can sue the trucking firm in a federal trial court because residents of different states.

  • over $75000

<h3>What takes place in a court case?</h3>

In a  trial done in a court, lawyers often present evidence via witnesses who are known to testify about what they have seen or known.

After all the evidence had been presented, the lawyers will then give their closing arguments and lastly, the jury then decides if the defendant is guilty or not guilty.

Learn more about jurisdiction from

brainly.com/question/681072

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the high and low levels of activity during the month, direct labor hours are 90,000 and 40,000, respectively. The related cos
andre [41]

Answer:

The fixed cost at any level of activity is $48,000 while the variable cost per unit at any level of activity is $1.30

Explanation:

The total cost is a function of the fixed and variable cost. Whilst the fixed cost does not change at a certain range of activities level, the variable cost changes as the level of activities(units produced or sold).

Using the high and low levels of activities given, let the variable cost per unit be v and the fixed cost F

for the high level,

F + 90,000v = 165,000

For the low level

F + 40,000v = 100,00

Solving both equations simultaneously,

50,000v = 65,000

v = $1.30

F + 40,000($1.30) = 100,000

F = 100,000 - 52,000

F = $48,000

5 0
3 years ago
Colleen Matthews had just turned 22 when her hard work finally started to pay off. Six months earlier Colleen graduated from a s
const2013 [10]

Answer:

Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving  illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning  and at the end of the period under investigation.

There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.

Explanation:

The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review.  Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities.  Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.

5 0
3 years ago
A salesperson working for Broker A sells a $150,000 home listed with another brokerage. The listing commission is 6.5 percent of
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

She is entitled to $3,217.5

Explanation:

First the amount the brokers and sales person are interested in is 6.5% of the selling price ($150,000). so calculating 6.5% of the selling price;

6.5% = 6.5/100 = 0.065

∴ 6.5% of $150,000 = 0.065 × 150,000 = $9,750

Next, we are interested in the cooperating broker (Broker A), who the sales person works for. Note that a cooperating broker is the broker who facilitates a real estate transaction, along with a listing broker who listed the property, and in this case the listing broker is Broker A, who the sales person works for.

We are told that the cooperating broker takes 60% of the listing commission ($9,750);

Therefore, 60% of $9,750 = 0.6 × 9,750 = $5,850

Next, we are also told that out of this amount, the sales person is responsible for 55% of the listing commission entering the cooperate broker's office;

Therefore, 55% of $5,850 = 0.55 × 5,850 = $3,217.5

Therefore the sales person is entitled to $3,217.5

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Understanding the link between education and your desierd career is an integral part of your career
    10·1 answer
  • Henri fayol developed 14 general principles of management including unity of command and the scalar chain which focused on the t
    8·1 answer
  • Universities are typically organized by departments or colleges such as business, biology, engineering, political science, and s
    10·1 answer
  • 1. Alejandro and Roger are working on a group project for class that requires writing a paper and designing charts to explain th
    5·1 answer
  • Would rocks make a good form of money? Explain why or why not?
    13·1 answer
  • Net exports might be a negative amount if Americans
    14·1 answer
  • Johnson Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectible accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is established as a
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following will not cause demand for apples to increase or decrease? a reduction in the price of apples. a reduction
    13·1 answer
  • An office manager is concerned with declining productivity. Despite the fact that she regularly monitors her clerical staff four
    6·1 answer
  • Complete the sentence with all of the accurate statements regarding the relationship between conscientiousness and job performan
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!