Answer:
Explanation:
The cost of equity can be estimated using two (2) different models:
- <em>The Dividend Valuation Model</em>
- <em>The capital asset pricing model (CAPM)</em>
<em>The Dividend Valuation Model(DVM) is a technique used to value the worth of an asset. According to this model, the value of an asset is the sum of the present values of the future cash flows would that arise from the asset discounted at the required rate of return. </em>
The model is stated below as follows
P = D(1+g)/ke-g)
<em>The capital asset pricing model (CAPM): relates the price of a share to the market risk or systematic risk. The systematic risk is that which affects all the all the economic agents, e.g inflation, interest rate e.t.c
</em>
<em>This model is considered superior to DVM. Hence, we will use the CAPM</em>
Using the CAPM , the expected return on a asset is given as follows:
E(r)= Rf +β(Rm-Rf)
E(r) =? , Rf- 2.86%, Rm-Rf - 7.00 β- 1.23
E(r) = 2.86% + 1.23× 7%
= 2.86% + 8.61%
= 11.47
%
Cost of equity= 11.47
%
Answer:
falling into debt if faced with a serious problem
Brainliest?
Answer:
The correct answer to the problem is 7.728%
Explanation:
Lucas marginal tax rate = 32 percent
Tax rate on dividends = 16 percent
Dividend yield of a dividend-paying stock (with no growth potential) = 9.20 percent.
To determine the interest rate a municipal bond have to offer for Lucas to be indifferent between the two investments from a cash flow perspective =
Dividend yield multiplied by ( 1- tax rate on dividends)
= 9.20% × (1 - 16%)
= 0.092 × (1 - 0.16)
= 0.092 × 0.84
= 7.728%
Answer:
The answer is: psychological contract
Explanation:
Psychological contracts are the expectations or promises exchanged between the parties; employer, employee, or even fellow employees, in an employment relationship. They are not written contracts, but they often implicit or understood between the parties. For example, an employee expects that if he or she works really hard, eventually he or she will receive a promotion or a salary raise.
hey there!:
1)
a) Amount of credit the company would receive against the FUTA tax for its SUTA contributions = 2896.21
(56900*3.1%*90%)+(56900*(5.4%-3.1%)) = 2896.21
b) Amount that Peroni Company would pay to the federal government for its FUTA tax = 517.79
(56900*6%)-2896.21 = 517.79
c) Amount that the company lost because of its late payments = 176.39
=517.79-(3414-1763.9-1308.7) = 176.39
Hope that helps!
