Answer: The European nations did not agree with Point 1-5 because they disagreed on freedom of the seas as well as war reparations. The Europeans thought that Points 1-5 did not serve the ends of the other allies such as France and Britain. Europeans thought that they could gain more from war victory than what President Wilson's plan allowed. He also failed to realize victorious European nations wanted to punish Germany above all else. They were imperialists and refused to give up colonies and wanted to take Germany's colonies.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

In general terms, how did the social makeup of U.S. military forces during World War II compare to or contrast with the wider Am

xeze [42]

The armed forces replicated patterns in the larger society in the 1940s.

For the most part, U.S. forces looked much like the civilian world. African Americans fought in segregated units. Women served in positions similar to their civilian jobs: as clerks, nurses, and communications operators.

<h3>How much does the US military relate to society?</h3>

The armed forces are a pillar of US power and influence around the world, deployed all over the world. However, many civilians are unaware of their composition. Women now account for 16% of the enlisted forces and 19% of the officer corps.

<h3>What percentage of the US population is in the military?</h3>

The active component of the military, excluding the coast guard, numbered 1.9 million men and women at the time, or about 1% of the population. There are currently about 1.3 million active-duty personnel, or less than half of one percent of the US population.

<h3>What role did the US military play in the Revolutionary War?</h3>

The U.S. Armed Forces have been crucial to American history since their inception during the American Revolutionary War. Their victories in the First and Second Barbary Wars contributed to the development of a sense of national identity.

Learn more about U.S. military forces during World War II:

brainly.com/question/14683299

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

The narrator's attitude toward Baghdad is best summarized as

sdas [7]

The Sirens of Baghdad is the story of one young man’s descent into hell—his journey from innocence to despair, from a peaceful life in a sleepy village to a rage for vengeance in the most violent city in the world. The narrator of the novel is a college student whose studies have been interrupted by the American invasion of Iraq. He has had to return to his desert village, where boredom, scorching heat, and the occasional boiling over of tempers when the war is being discussed are the most serious problems he must face. The war is a distant phenomenon, something they hear about but doesn’t really touch them. That all changes when Sulayman, the local blacksmith’s sweet-natured, mentally challenged son, accidentally severs two fingers and must be taken to the hospital. When their car is stopped at a checkpoint, Sulayman panics, tries to run away, and is riddled with bullets. “Every bullet that struck the fugitive,” the narrator says, “pierced me through and through” [p 57]. But this is only the first of the humiliations and tragedies he must witness. When soldiers come to search the village for suspected insurgents, the narrator watches as his aged father is pulled naked from his bed and thrown to the floor. The disgrace of this moment engender in him a need to wash away in blood the humiliation his father has suffered. This is the turning point that sends him down a path to terrorism and destruction.

4 0

3 years ago