Answer: d. Game theory is not necessary for understanding competitive or monopoly markets.
Explanation:
Game Theory in Business is applied to see the options available to competitors in the market if they engage in certain actions because the outcome of one party's decision is affected by the decision of the other party. In the context of business it is often used to calculate how much profit or loss companies will make if they engage in certain actions based on the decisions of the other party.
It is therefore not necessary in Perfect Completions because the market sets the price and the participants follow. There is not need to analyse what will happen if one party picks a certain method and the other as well. It will be irrelevant because the same price will be imposed regardless.
It is also unnecessary in Monopoly markets simply because a monopoly has market control and Game theory is for situations where at least 2 parties are fighting for market control.
B is the answer.
Websites, games and presentations can all have music incorporated into them. In each of the other three options there is at least one item that is text based that would not have music incorporated into it.
Answer:
Closer to the competitive equilibrium, thereby reducing social efficiency.
Explanation:
The market is not failed itself, so there is no need of taxes to clear it but to arrange revenue for government taxes some of the luxurious products the tax shifts supply curve to left and decrease equilibrium quantity which makes the dead weight loss in the market and the quantity get away from the efficient level.
In absence of market failures, when the government taxes market participants, the effect is to move the market :
Answer:
Explanation below
Explanation:
When organizations are looking at hiring interns, they should make sure it does not go against the laws of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) which broadly defines what it means to employ someone and remained silent regarding whether interns should be exempted from minimum wages.
FLSA provides that if your company like that of Wayne in the question, benefits from the use of interns they hired, then they must pay them a sum that is equivalent to the minimum wage.
But if the intern does not do any work that directly benefits the organization, but just there to learn and watch how things are going, then it can be justified in not paying them at all.
so Wayne's rights have been violated since the wage was below the minimum wage.
