Answer:
Relevance and cost effectiveness
Explanation:
Full disclosure principle means that a business should report all the relevant and necessary information regarding their financial statement to the people who are accustomed to reading it as not disclosing full information might affect the readers understanding.
It prevents any lack of information from the business's financial information and helps to ensure that creditors, stakeholders and investors are aware of all the relevant information while making key decisions that affect the company.
Not disclosing all the information could manipulate the companies financial statement and it may look stronger that it really is.
Answer:
B) Abstract and opinion.
Explanation:
Abstract and opinion can also be call Abstract of title:
this is the records or evidence of the full history of the property from the conveyance,wills, legal backing, and the list of those people that as assume ownership of the property for a particular period of time.
A full summary of all consecutive grants, conveyances, wills, records, and judicial proceedings affecting title to a specific parcel of real estate, together with a statement of all recorded liens and encumbrances affecting the property and their present status, but not including encroachments and forgeries, is known as a Abstract of Title or Abstract and opinion.
Answer:
The break-even point in sales dollars is: C. $32,000
Explanation:
During the current year 11,000 hams were sold resulting in $220,000 of sales revenue, $55,000 of variable costs, and $24,000 of fixed cost.
Contribution margin ratio = (Sales - Total Variable cost)/Sales = ($220,000 - $55,000)/$220,000 = 0.75
The break-even point sales dollars is calculated by using following formula:
Break-even point in sales dollars = Fixed cost/Contribution margin ratio = $24,000/0.75 = $32,000
Answer:
The correct answer is Assign costs of work process.
Explanation:
Among the main changes to be able to allocate costs, Julio must take the costs of work in process in a single account, instead of directly to different department accounts. This will ensure better control of the information, avoiding mistakes in the planning process.
Answer:
The answer is: C) lose because he will not be able to prove reliance on the misrepresentation.
Explanation:
In order for Larson to be able to rescind the contract, he would have to prove that he had reasonable reliance that Robert Redford owned that specific car. Reasonable reliance refers to a person believing something to be a fact, which any other person could reasonably believe in as well.
But exactly how could he prove that someone else might also believe that the car was previously owned by Robert Redford? I find it very doubtful that he can prove that.
