Answer:
a letter written by a person who is describing a current event
Explanation:
A primary source is a document from the time period of the event.
While most of these could be considered one, you have to do a process of elimination.
A scholarly article about an old event isn't a primary source, so it's not that.
An interview with a reporter who wrote about a current event is not a primary source because it is not the original document from the reporter.
A student's report about an event that occurred during her lifetime is a primary source, but it is not the best example.
The tragedy of the commons occurs where property rights are lacking.
In economics, the tragedy of the commons is the situation in which individual users, who have free access to resources, are not bound by shared social structures or rules. officially govern access and use, acting independently in their own interest and contrary to general principles. common interests of all users, causing resource depletion due to their uncoordinated actions.
The concept originated in an essay written in 1833 by the British economist William Forster Lloyd, who used a hypothetical example of the impact of unregulated grazing on the region. common land in Great Britain and Ireland.
To know more about tragedy of the commons here-
brainly.com/question/29221557
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Because anciencient Asian was very important and has a major effect on many things
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
