1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
3 years ago
11

Unlike childhood peer groups, adolescent peer groups _______. a. are controlled by parents. b. may include more members of the o

pposite gender. c. disregard the importance of shared activities. d. are less likely to be influenced by a similarity in attitudes.
Social Studies
1 answer:
9966 [12]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

d. are less likely to be influenced by a similarity in attitudes.

Explanation:

Childhood peer group and adolescent peer group are two distinct group in the life of every individual all over the world. During childhood, the peer group tends to have a great infulence leading to the determination of the group of activities done together. This could be music, dance, type of cloth worn or the frienship kept.

While in adolescent stage, the peer group tends to have minimal influence as a result of the individual trying to discover his or her purpose in life and trying to re-alinging his or life to a long term career goal. example is an adolescent that want to be a doctor would definetly prevent his peer group of friends leaning towards music to influence him to abandone his dreams and join the bandwagon which they all are in.

<em>He will prefer to minimize his relationship with the peer group while pursuing his dream  career goals. </em>

You might be interested in
Both moral reasoning and moral reflection yield conclusions about what should or should not done; these conclusions are called?
Morgarella [4.7K]

Both moral reasoning and moral reflection yield conclusions about what should or should not done; these conclusions are called moral judgements

Our ability to make decisions based on logic or on intuition both play a role in judgment. To evaluate situations, actions, people, behavior, etc., one makes moral judgments, which are judgments with a moral underpinning.

According to some, moral judgments are frequently founded on intuition or feeling, which is typically connected to the emotions. This theory of moral judgment holds that conscious thought has no bearing on the moral conclusion.

Moral judgments, according to intuitionists, are often connected to emotions and are based on intuition or feeling. Numerous sources of evidence are cited by intuitionists to bolster their viewpoint.

As an illustration, moral judgments frequently involve moral reasoning that occurs "after the fact." As a result, we frequently make moral decisions hastily and based solely on our initial impressions.

Learn more about moral judgments here

brainly.com/question/15392471

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Liliuokalani served as queen in Hawaii. <br><br> True or False
Serggg [28]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Queen Liliuokalani (1838-1917) was the last sovereign of the Kalākaua dynasty, which had ruled a unified Hawaiian kingdom since 1810. ... When Liliuokalani acted to restore these powers, a U.S. military-backed coup deposed her in 1893 and formed a provisional government; Hawaii was declared a republic in 1894.

Nationality: Hawaiian Kingdom

Family: House of Kalākaua

4 0
3 years ago
Do you think woman and man should have different roles in the running of a home based on gender? Discuss.
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

This is not the nineteenth century where there are housewives doing all the household chores whilst the men go off to work and provide for their family. Sure, there are some countries like Uruguay where the female children are taught they have to wash the dishes and fold and iron the clothes whereas if they have a brother, their brother does not. However, I do not find this rigtheous whatsoever. Everyone is equal; we should not discriminate or delegate tasks depending upon our genders.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A tendency to overestimate the extent to which a stranger's violent behavior stems from his or her aggressive personality best i
Anna007 [38]

Answer:

Fundamental attribution error

Explanation:

Due to the fundamental attribution error, people tend to have the belief that others do bad things due to the fact that they are not good people. This theory explains the tendency for us to judge other people harshly but when we are guilty of the same unethical behavior, we tend to want to easily get ourselves off the hook.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes most tundra animals?
scZoUnD [109]
answer: d

stocky bodies with thick fur and feathers

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statements describe an hourly wage job?
    13·2 answers
  • True or false? according to prochaska's stages of change model, having a relapse with a negative behavior is actually part of on
    14·1 answer
  • Why didn't the Spanish colonies unite after independence?
    8·1 answer
  • Children with several different types of bilingualism outperformed monolingual english speakers on tasks of ____.
    6·1 answer
  • Reconstruction ended with the election of ___ as President.
    15·1 answer
  • Will's mom offered him the incentive of two movie tickets if he finished cleaning his room by noon.
    13·2 answers
  • Silence is not a care of all ​
    7·1 answer
  • Many colonists did not feel represented by British Parliament, while Wales and Scotland held 27 and 45 seats, respectively, the
    11·2 answers
  • Which refers to the process of imagining one’s desired future and facing obstacles?
    15·1 answer
  • What do we call the process by which the editor combines and coordinates individual shots into a cinematic whole?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!