1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marysya [2.9K]
3 years ago
10

4. In general, the electric force is directly related to the magnitude (strength) of the charges. This means that as the magnitu

de of the charges increases, the electric force will also:
A. Increase
B. Decrease
C. Not change at all
D. There is no way to know

5. Therefore, when the magnitude of one charge is increased by a factor, the magnitude of the force will…
A. Increase by the same factor
B. Decrease by the same factor
C. Increase by the square of the factor
D. Decrease by the square of the factor
E. Not change at all

Based on your previous answers, which statement best describes how the electric force would change if the magnitude of Charge 1 were DECREASED?
A. The electric force would decrease.
B. The electric force would increase.
C. The electric force would not change.
D. There is no way to know.

My teacher didn't explain this well
Physics
1 answer:
bija089 [108]3 years ago
7 0

4.  A. Increase

The magnitude of the electric force between two charges is given by Coulomb's law:

F=k\frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}

where

k is the Coulomb's constant

q_1 and q_2 are the two charges

r is the separation between the two charges

As we see from the formula, the strength of the electric force is:

- directly proportional to the two charges q1 and q2

- inversely proportional to the square of the distance r

Therefore, we can conclude that:

- if the magnitude of the charges increases, then the magnitude of the force will increases as well

- if the separation between the charges increases, then the magnitude of the force will decrease

5. A. Increase by the same factor

Again, the magnitude of the electric force between the two charges is given by Coulomb's law:

F=k\frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}

we have said that the force F is directly proportional to the two charges q_1 and q_2.

Let's assume now that charge q_1 is increases by a certain factor A. Then the electric force will change as follows:

F'=k\frac{(A q_1) q_2}{r^2}=A(k\frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2})=A\cdot F

so, the magnitude of the electric force has increased by the same factor.

6. A. The electric force would decrease.

This part is similar to part 5, however this time the charge q_1 is decreased.

This means that we can rewrite the new charge q1 as

q_1 ' = \frac{q_1}{A}

where A > 1. Let's see how the electric force changes:

F'=k\frac{(\frac{q_1}{A}) q_2}{r^2}=\frac{1}{A}(k\frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2})=\frac{F}{A}

This means that the magnitude of the electric force has decreased by the same factor.

You might be interested in
2. A carpenter tosses a shingle off a 9.4 m high roof, giving it an initial horizontal
Aleksandr [31]

Sounds like the shingle/ball is thrown from the roof horizontally, so that the distance it travels <em>x</em> after time <em>t</em> horizontally is

<em>x</em> = (7.2 m/s) <em>t</em>

The object's height <em>y</em> at time <em>t</em> is

<em>y</em> = 9.4 m - 1/2 <em>gt</em>²

where <em>g</em> = 9.80 m/s² is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity, and its vertical velocity is

<em>v</em> = -<em>gt</em>

(a) The object hits the ground when <em>y</em> = 0:

0 = 9.4 m - 1/2 <em>gt</em>²

<em>t</em>² = 2 * (9.4 m) / (9.80 m/s²)

<em>t</em> ≈ 1.92 s

at which time the object's vertical velocity is

<em>v</em> = -<em>g</em> (1.92 s) = -18.8 m/s ≈ -19 m/s

(b) See part (a); it takes the object about 1.9 s to reach the ground.

(c) The object travels a horizontal distance of

<em>x</em> = (7.2 m/s) * (1.92 s) ≈ 13.8 m ≈ 14 m

8 0
3 years ago
What features form where two continental plate come together
ExtremeBDS [4]
Ridges, mountains, and volcanoes!

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a body p with a positive charge is placed in contact with a body q (initially uncharged), what will be the nature of the char
uysha [10]

If a body p with a positive charge is placed in contact with a body q (initially uncharged), then the nature of charge gained by q must be positive, because rubbing an uncharged body with a charged body or placed in contact with a positive charged body, helps gain a charge to the uncharged body.

There are a variety of methods to charge an object. One method is known as induction. In the induction process, a charged object is brought near but not touched to a neutral conducting object.

Let's know, how a element gain positive charge?

A positive charge occurs when the number of protons exceeds the number of electrons. A positive charge may be created by adding protons to an atom or object with a neutral charge. A positive charge also can be created by removing electrons from a neutrally charged object.

To learn more about Positive charge here

brainly.com/question/2903220

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
A slender rod is 90.0 cm long and has mass 0.120 kg. A small 0.0200 kg sphere is welded to one end of the rod, and a small 0.070
likoan [24]

Given Information:

length of slender rod = L = 90 cm = 0.90 m

mass of slender rod = m = 0.120 kg

mass of sphere welded to one end = m₁ = 0.0200 kg

mass of sphere welded to another end = m₂ = 0.0700 kg (typing error in the question it must be 0.0500 kg as given at the end of the question)

Required Information:

Linear speed of the 0.0500 kg sphere = v = ?

Answer:

Linear speed of the 0.0500 kg sphere = 1.55 m/s

Explanation:

The velocity of the sphere can by calculated using

ΔKE = ½Iω²

Where I is the moment of inertia of the whole setup ω is the speed and ΔKE is the change in kinetic energy

The moment of inertia of a rigid rod about center is given by

I = (1/12)mL²

The moment of inertia due to m₁ and m₂ is

I = (m₁+m₂)(L/2)²

L/2 means that the spheres are welded at both ends of slender rod whose length is L.

The overall moment of inertia becomes

I = (1/12)mL² + (m₁+m₂)(L/2)²

I = (1/12)0.120*(0.90)² + (0.0200+0.0500)(0.90/2)²

I = 0.0081 + 0.01417

I = 0.02227 kg.m²

The change in the potential energy is given by

ΔPE = m₁gh₁ + m₂gh₂

Where h₁ and h₂ are half of the length of slender rod

L/2 = 0.90/2 = 0.45 m

ΔPE = 0.0200*9.8*0.45 + 0.0500*9.8*-0.45

The negative sign is due to the fact that that m₂ is heavy and it would fall and the other sphere m₁ is lighter and it would will rise.

ΔPE = -0.1323 J

This potential energy is then converted into kinetic energy therefore,

ΔKE = ½Iω²

0.1323 = ½(0.02227)ω²

ω² = (2*0.1323)/0.02227

ω = √(2*0.1323)/0.02227

ω = 3.45 rad/s

The linear speed is

v = (L/2)ω

v = (0.90/2)*3.45

v = 1.55 m/s

Therefore, the linear speed of the 0.0500 kg sphere as its passes through its lowest point is 1.55 m/s.

8 0
3 years ago
On my science test, there is a bonus question that I want to get right. Why would it be a bad idea to skydive on the moon? Hint:
eduard

Answer:

Because there is no air resistance

Explanation:

When an object falls on Earth, there are essentially two forces acting on it:

- The force of gravity, downward, equal to the weight of the object:

W=mg

where m is the mass and g the acceleration due to gravity

- The air resistance, F, which acts upward, and whose magnitude is generally proportional to v, the speed of the object

When the object starts its fall, its initial speed is zero: v = 0, so the air resistance is also zero: F=0, and the object accelerates downward due to gravity.

However, as it accelerates downward, its speed increases, and so does the air resistance F. However, F is upward, opposite to the direction of motion, therefore it reduces the net acceleration of the object; at a certain point, the magnitude of the air resistance will become equal to the weight, so that

mg = F

and at that point, the net acceleration of the object will become zero: this means that the object will continue its fall at a constant velocity, called terminal velocity.

On the Moon instead, there is no air resistance: this means that for an object falling down, the speed keeps increasing due to the effect of gravity, and it will never reach a terminal value: therefore, the final velocity at the impact will be much higher than on the Earth, if we assume the two objects have been dropped from a very high altitude from the surface.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The force of gravity between two objects depends on ___________.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the explanatory powers of hypotheses and theories?
    6·2 answers
  • A particle moves according to the law of motion s(t) = t^{3}-8t^{2}+2t, t\ge 0, where t is measured in seconds and s in feet. a.
    12·1 answer
  • The density of ice is 917 kg/m3, and the density of sea water is 1025 kg/m3. A swimming polar bear climbs onto a piece of floati
    15·1 answer
  • The elements in Groups 3 through 12 of the periodic table are the ______.
    7·2 answers
  • 5 ways in which friction can be useful
    15·2 answers
  • PLZZZ HELP
    14·1 answer
  • In a parallel circuit, if one bulb goes out the other bulbs will continue to work because they each have their own path.
    14·2 answers
  • In the concluding paragraph, how does the author make the conflicting point of view that vegetarianism is strange and unnatural
    9·2 answers
  • The Newton is the SI unit for ____.<br> temperature<br> mass<br> weight<br> density
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!