If a correlation coefficient was r = -0.94, what would this represent?

Mathematics

1 answer:

nasty-shy [4]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

this would represent a strong negative

Step-by-step explanation:

on a correlation line you have strong negatives,weak negatives,none,weak positives, and strong positives.Since the coefficient is a hand negative, focus on the left side. A weak negative is -0.5 greater than or equal to so since -0.94 is less than -0.5 it advances on to the next category of the correlation line, thus resulting in the correlation coefficient to be a strong negative.

You might be interested in

Tickets for wisconsin state fair cost $13 for adults and $7 for children. After the first day, the wisconsin state fair sold 900

sergiy2304 [10]

First, let's define your variables!

x=cost of tickets for adults
y=cost of tickets for kids...

You know that they sold 900 tickets, which means the combination of x and y equals 900.
Therefore one equation is...
x+y=900
We also have to take care of the second equation...
We know that 13x represents the total cost of ADULT tickets
We know 7y represents the total cost for the children...
Which means...
13x+7y=11000
There are you equations! (bolded)

6 0

4 years ago

Segment EG is an angle bisector of angle FGH. Noah wrote a proof to show that triangle HEG is congruent to triangle FEG. Noah's

tangare [24]

Answer:

Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.

But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.

8 0

3 years ago

2/3 cups of raisins are mixed with 1/2 cup peanuts what is the ratio

krok68 [10]

3:5 because if you add the fractions together it is what you get so the 5 would be raisins and the 3 would be peanuts

6 0

3 years ago

I really need help and my sister don’t know how to explain it’s

Reika [66]

All the answer is is you are multiplying by 10 everytime.

7 0

4 years ago