For number one, wolves may eat fish instead of larger animals because those larger animals may be going into hibernation and also the berries that a wolf may eat has also gone out of season, leaving the only choice really being fish.
For number two, over harvesting salmon is pretty bad when it comes to the environment. it takes away food from predators, like the wolves in number one, so they lose a source of food and it also takes away the salmons ability to eat the smaller organisms in the stream, so they're going to become overpopulated.
You haven't specified if which type of cell you are referring to. There are many types of cells and each cell would have different reactions when immersed in a beaker of distilled water. So let us take for example, the red blood cell. A distilled water is hypotonic compared to the solution contained within the cells' membranes. Therefore, t<span>he distilled water will diffuse into the red blood cells and cause them to burst. Hope this answers the question.</span>
Answer:
Is the benefit worth the cost?
Explanation:
Environmental policies application has to lead to some economic cost.
When coming up with this policies, the effect that this policies shall have towards environmental protection shall be considered.
The cost and economic effect that this policies shall cause should also be looked at.
If a policy causes insignificant change towards environmental protection and at the same time the costs are too high, then the policy should be dropped.
If a policy has got significant impact and costs less, the it should be taken.
Carbon dioxide
this is the answer
A codon<span> is a three-base sequence (three nitrogen bases in a row) on mRNA. It calls for a specific amino acid to be brought to the growing polypeptide. An </span>anticodon<span> is a three-base sequence on tRNA. It matches the </span>codon<span>.</span>
