Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
We can test each pair making each ratio into its simplest form.
For A 2/3 is already in its simplest form and 9/15=3/5. they are not equivalent.
For B, 5/8 is already in its simplest form and 15/21=5/7. they are not equivalent.
For C, 3/12=1/4, and 6/18=1/3. They are not equivalent.
For D, 4/10=2/5, and 12/30=2/5. They are equivalent.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
A. because the line of best fit has to be at best fit between the points so is a good approximation of where all the points are heading when you try to predict something.
Answer:
2. z=8
3.2x=16
5.distributive property
7.Addition property of equality
i'm not 100%ly sure so if it's wrong sorry and pls don't report mine i'm just trying to help not get my answer deleted:)
0.3 repeating is greater.
Answer:
The sample size is too small
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is the last one: the sample size is too small. Since we only got 3 subjects to test, maybe one of them could live for a long time after the diagnosis of Cacer and that made the average survival time go up by a lot.
In order to obtain results with a significance level higher, you need a sample size of at least 20 subjects.
Now lets see why other options wouldnt be good answers:
- For a small amount of subjects, it is unlikely to have errors in caculation
- The sample size is given
- We are not given information about the treatment and we dont even know if the subjects feel more confident with the new treatment. Also, if a Placebo effect works regularly, it shouldnt limit statistical sifgnificance
- An increase in 2 years is huge in comparison with the previous survival time.