Answer:
Olympia Autos Inc. and Vaca Autos Inc.
This merger scenario illustrates the power of synergy.
Explanation:
Synergy is achieved with Olympia Autos Inc that has technological competencies, merging with Vaca Autos' marketing capacities. This enable the two entities to achieve more as one than they could have achieved individually. By capturing a larger market share, the two entities have shown that the combination of resources in pursuit of some common objectives is more beneficial than separate efforts.
Answer:
Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.
In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": lawn fertilizer manufacturer.
Explanation:
Process costing is a type of costing approach used by companies to identify expenses for individual units produced. This method is useful for manufacturers in charge of mass production where all the units are almost the same or equal. Thus, <em>a lawn manufacturer could use the process costing system</em> because the equipment produced in that industry are almost equal and tend to be manufactured in large quantities.
Answer: (b) -3.08
Explanation:
The relationship between the demand(q), price per unit product(p) and the disposable income,yd is given by the expression below;
q= 20ln(7yd-2p).
From the expression above, the marginal demand,
∂ q/∂ p is the differential of the equation of relationship between the demand, price and disposable income.
This involves considering the demand,q as the dependent variable and the price per unit product,p as the independent variable and the disposable income,yd is considered constant.
Therefore ,
∂ q/∂ p= (-40)÷(7yd-2p)
By substitution of
yd =$3000÷1000= $3
and p= $4
∂ q/∂ p= (-40)÷((7×$3)-(2×$4))
∂ q/∂ p= -40÷13= 3.08
Please see the attachment for knowledge on how ∂ q/∂ p was obtained.
