Answer:
22.9 Liters CO(g) needed
Explanation:
2CO(g) + O₂(g) => 2CO₂(g)
? Liters 32.65g
= 32.65g/32g/mol
= 1.02 moles O₂
Rxn ratio for CO to O₂ = 2 mole CO(g) to 1 mole O₂(g)
∴moles CO(g) needed = 2 x 1.02 moles CO(g) = 2.04 moles CO(g)
Conditions of standard equation* is STP (0°C & 1atm) => 1 mole any gas occupies 22.4 Liters.
∴Volume of CO(g) = 1.02mole x 22.4Liters/mole = 22.9 Liters CO(g) needed
___________________
*Standard Equation => molecular rxn balanced to smallest whole number ratio coefficients is assumed to be at STP conditions (0°C & 1atm).
10 km/h
Because if you take 35 and multiply it by 2, and take 0.5 and multiply it by 2, you get 70 kilometers in 1 hour. Therefore, 70-60 is 10 km/h
1) Chemical reaction (thermal decomposition)
2NaHCO3 (s) ---> Na2CO3 (s) + H2O (g) + CO2(g)
2) Reasoning
The lost of mass is due to the lost of the gases H2O and CO2.
So, you can calculate the mass of Na2CO3 obtained from 1.000 g NaHCO3, and the difference will be the mass lost.
2) Convert 1.000 g of NaHCO3 to number of moles
molar mass NaHCO3: 1*23g/mol + 1*1g/mol + 1*12g/mol + 3*16g/mol = 84 g/mol
number of moles = mass in grams / molar mass = 1.000 g / 84 g/mol = 0.01190 moles
3) Use therotecial molar ratios:
2 moles NaHCO3 : 1 mol Na2CO3
=> 0.01190 mol NaHCO3 / x = 2 mol NaHCO3 / 1mol Na2CO3
=> x = 1mol Na2CO3 * 0.01190 mol NaHCO3 / 2 mol NaHCO3
=> x = 0.00595 mol Na2CO3
4) Convert 0.0595 mol Na2CO3 to mass
molar mass Na2CO3: 2*23g/mol + 1*12g/mol + 3*16g/mol = 106 g/mol
mass in grams = number of moles * molar mass = 0.00595 mol * 106 g/mol = 0.6307 g
5) lost mass
1.000g - 0.6307g = 0.3693 g
Answer: 0.3693 g
Answer : The labs were unable to reproduce the pharmaceutical company’s data.
Explanation : Any scientific claim must have reproducible experimental data. In this case, when the pharmaceutical company has the claim of reducing the cancer growth cells by 35% then by using the same manufacturing procedure for the drug and lab should be able to get this result. But they failed to match up with the results which clearly indicates that the labs were not able to produce the same results and hence they concluded that the pharmaceutical company's claims were invalid.
