Answer:
The answer is option A) The short run recommendation for a monopolistic firm is to remain at the current output level
Explanation:
In the short run, monopolistic firms could record losses but still continue to run in anticipation of a sustainable profit in the long run.
A self-employed profit-maximizing consultant specializing in monopolies understands that the short run losses experienced in a monopoly is also an advantage in that it reduces the participation of more players in the same industry/ market segment.
The best recommendation would be to remain at the current output level during the short run to cut losses, sustain patronage and then develop a long term strategy that will guarantee profitability in the long run.
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer:
$18,750
Explanation:
Income from investment = 25% * $75,000
Income from investment = 0.25 * $75,000
Income from investment = $18,750
The amount that will be reported by Poke as income from its investment in Shove for 20X8, if it used the equity method of accounting is $18,750
Answer:
if the business is florishing, as an example Medical sectors during pandemic they are going to grow till they are in a high demand
