Answer:
a. 1.5 and 1.8
b. Montana
Explanation:
Below is the calculation for the current ratio:
a. Formula used, Current ratio = Current assets / Current liabilities
Current ratio of Kansas = 59000 / 40000 = 1.5
Current ratio of Montana = 78000 / 43000 = 1.8
b. The company that has a higher current ratio will have a greater likelihood to pay bills so Montana is the correct answer.
Answer:
- Single asset = Coefficient of Variation
- Portfolio = Beta
Explanation:
When dealing with standalone risk, coefficient of variation is best because it shows the amount by which the asset's returns might deviate from the average returns of the market.
As for portfolio assets that are well diversified, the best measure would be beta because diversified portfolios deal with systematic risk and beta shows the movement of the portfolio in relation to the market and so will show that systematic risk.
Answer:
Dr Land $146,440
Cr Common stock (3,380 shares×$12 par value) $40,560
Cr Paid in Capital in excess of Par common stock $105,880
Explanation:
Arasota Company Journal entry
Dr Land $146,440
Cr Common stock (3,380 shares×$12 par value) $40,560
Cr Paid in Capital in excess of Par common stock $105,880
Most trade is due to the comparative advantage of an organization's ability to produce a good or service with lower marginal cost and opportunity cost.
As an example, we can cite trade between Africa and the United States, where Africa markets agricultural products such as corn and citrus to the US, and the US markets technological products such as computers to Africa.
Therefore, companies will use comparative advantage to acquire goods and services at lower prices than other competitors.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/7780461
Answer:
The performance problem to minor burns will be mainly psychological.
Explanation:
The staff involved will most likely exhibit a reduction in speed at which he or she executed the task which led to the burn.
If the personnel is in a chain of production where their own activity feeds others, it may translate to the increase in the time taken to achieve results.
One solution to this is to critically examine the production process and eliminate the cause of the accident if any.
If the cause of the incident was as a result of carelessness on the part of the staff, then he or she might have to be rescheduled to another department or unit where their current mindset will not stall the overall performance of the team/production line.
Cheers!
