All categories

3 years ago

A dog walks a distance of 55.5 meters in 120 seconds. What was its speed?

Physics

1 answer:

Nitella [24]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: ...

Explanation: 1: The dog is walking 0.4625MPS (Meters per second. M/S)

To calculate speed you divide the distance by time so 55.5 Meters/120 Seconds is 0.4625 MPS

2: The car traveled 15 KM

To calculate speed you need to multiply the speed by time. (Since it's multiplication it can be put in any order) So 600 Secondsx25 Meters is 15,000 M which is 15 KM.

3: It would take 8 Minutes and 20 Seconds to travel 1500 Meters.

To calculate the time you multiply Speed by distance (Order doesn't count.)

So 1500 Metersx3 MPS is 8 Minutes and 20 seconds.

4: It was going 2.7775 MPS.

To calculate the speed you divide the distance over time. So 9999 Meters/3600 seconds is 2.7775 MPS.

5: It was going 1.1222... (Infinite)

To calculate the speed you divide the distance over time

So 8080 Meters/ 7200 Seconds is 1.222...

6: It would cover 1.375 Meters.

To calculate the Distance you multiply Speed by time (Order doesn't count.)

So 10.25 Secondsx5.5 MPS is 1.375 Meters.

7: It would take 1 Minute and 31 Seconds to travel 10 Meters.

To calculate the time you multiply Speed by distance (Order doesn't count.)

So 10 Metersx0.11 MPS is 1 Minute and 31 seconds

Hopes this helps because this took over 10 minutes.

You might be interested in

Many minerals, such as silver, are good conductors of heat and electricity. How could technology use this property to help ident

Aleks [24]

Answer:

This property could be used to create technologically-advanced tools or machines that could easily locate the mineral deposits.

Explanation:

Mineral deposits are hard to find, unless you have the skill or the proper tools in locating them. This is the reason why many people are mining in order to explore the different areas where they could find these deposits.

If one would consider the property of minerals, such as being good conductors of heat and electricity,<u> then they could create a tool or machine that would aid in their exploration.</u> Inventors could probably come up with a sensitive detector which signals when it reaches an area of high heat and electric conductivity. Since most minerals such as <em>gold, silver, copper, galena, bornite </em>and the like have this property, then miners will have a lesser amount of time looking for them.

If this technology will be implemented, though, regulation policy must be strictly implemented because it might lead to<em> over-mining</em> thus leading to the depletion of mineral deposits.

3 0

3 years ago

The melting point of a substance occurs at the same temperatures as it’s blank point

azamat

I think it's a.

Explanation:

melting point is boiling

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the atomic mass of oxygen?

lianna [129]

Answer:

$atomic \: mass \: of \: oxygen = 15.99aproximtly = 16 \\ thank \: you$

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A hanging weight, with a mass of m1 = 0.365 kg, is attached by a string to a block with mass m2 = 0.825 kg as shown in the figur

morpeh [17]

The speed of the block after it has moved the given distance away from the initial position is 1.1 m/s.

<h3>Angular Speed of the pulley </h3>

The angular speed of the pulley after the block m1 fall through a distance, d, is obatined from conservation of energy and it is given as;

K.E = P.E

$\frac{1}{2} mv^2 + \frac{1}{2} I\omega^2 = mgh\\\\\frac{1}{2} m_2v_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} \omega^2(m_1R^2_2 + m_2R_2^2) + \frac{1}{2} \omega^2( \frac{1}{2} MR_1^2 + \frac{1}{2} MR_2^2) = m_1gd- \mu_km_2gd\\\\\frac{1}{2} m_2v_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} \omega^2[R_2^2(m_1 + m_2)+ \frac{1}{2} M(R_1^2 + R_2^2)] = gd(m_1 - \mu_k m_2)\\\\$

$\frac{1}{2} m_2v_0 + \frac{1}{4} \omega^2[2R_2^2(m_1 + m_2) + M(R^2_1 + R^2_2)] = gd(m_1 - \mu_k m_2)\\\\2m_2v_0 + \omega^2 [2R_2^2(m_1 + m_2) + M(R^2_1 + R^2_2)] = 4gd(m_1 - \mu_k m_2)\\\\\omega^2 [2R_2^2(m_1 + m_2) + M(R^2_1 + R^2_2)] = 4gd(m_1 - \mu_k m_2) - 2m_2v_0^2\\\\\omega^2 = \frac{ 4gd(m_1 - \mu_k m_2) - 2m_2v_0^2}{2R_2^2(m_1 + m_2) + M(R^2_1 + R^2_2)} \\\\\omega = \sqrt{\frac{ 4gd(m_1 - \mu_k m_2) - 2m_2v_0^2}{2R_2^2(m_1 + m_2) + M(R^2_1 + R^2_2)}} \\\\$

Substitute the given parameters and solve for the angular speed;

$\omega = \sqrt{\frac{ 4(9.8)(0.7)(0.365 \ - \ 0.25\times 0.825) - 2(0.825)(0.82)^2}{2(0.03)^2(0.365 \ + \ 0.825)\ \ +\ \ 0.35(0.02^2\ + \ 0.03^2)}} \\\\\omega = \sqrt{\frac{3.25}{0.00214\ + \ 0.000455 } } \\\\\omega = 35.39 \ rad/s$

<h3>Linear speed of the block</h3>

The linear speed of the block after travelling 0.7 m;

v = ωR₂

v = 35.39 x 0.03

v = 1.1 m/s

Thus, the speed of the block after it has moved the given distance away from the initial position is 1.1 m/s.

Learn more about conservation of energy here: brainly.com/question/24772394

5 0

2 years ago

What is the difference between charging by contact and charging by induction in terms of electron transfer.

Veronika [31]

Answer:

the main difference between charging by contact and charging by induction is that in the first case, the two objects are touching, while in the second case, the two objects do not touch

Explanation:

There are three methods of charging an object:

- Charging by friction: this is done by rubbing an object against another object. An example is when a plastic rod is rubbed with a wool cloth. When this is done, electrons are transferred from the wool to the rod, so both objects remain charged at the end of the process

- Charging by contact: this is done by putting in contact a charged object with a neutral, conducting object. In this case, the charges are transferred from the charged object to the neutral object; at the end of the process, the neutral object will also have a net electric charge, so it will be also charged.

- Charging by induction: in this case, we take a charged object, and a neutral object, and we place the two objects close to each other, but without touching. Let's assume that the charged object is negatively charged: in this case, the positive charges in the neutral object are attracted towards the negative charges of the charged object, while the negative charges of the neutral object are repelled away. As a result, the positive and negative charges in the neutral object split apart. If the object is connected to the ground, then negative charges move away, so the neutral object will remain positively charged.

Therefore, the main difference between charging by contact and charging by induction is that in the first case, the two objects are touching, while in the second case, the two objects do not touch.

5 0

3 years ago