<span>Mass of nitrogen = 14.0067
</span>
Mass of oxygen = 15.9994
In this compound nitrogen = 36.86 /
14.0067 = 2.63
<span>And oxygen = 63.14 / 15.9994 = 3.95 <span>
now we have: N----- 2.63 and O----3.95
by dividing both with the smallest number we get
</span></span>
<span>N-------2.63/2.63 = 1<span>
<span>O-------3.95/2.63 = 1.5
To get whole numbers we multiply both by 2
</span></span></span>
N= 1 x 2 = 2
And O = 1.5 x 2= 3
<span>So, the empirical formula is N</span>₂O₃.
Answer: That would be false because it is the contact between two layers representing a gap in the geologic record, usually from the erosion of the layers which would normally be expected to appear.
Explanation:
Have a good day
I hope this helps if not sorry :(
Stay motivated
Answer: the reliability will be worse
Explanation:
Suppose we used 0.5 M NaOH to titrate our vinegar sample instead of 0.1 M.
Now by using 0.5M instead of 0.1M we are increasing the concentration of NaOH,
We know that the moles used = Volume x concnetration.
so for the same no of moles, if the concentration increases, the volume decreases.
Hence it will consume less NaOH.
now Since the volume decreases, the titration volume of less number will increase the % error.
Therefore the reliability will be worse.
Answer:
It’s false
Explanation:
it could be true if the question mentioned alkaline solution
4. I meter
5. 0.453 kilometers
6. 89.84700 microns
7. Yo momma
