What is the ratio of 420kg and 450kg

3x - 12y = 24<br><br> Which of the following points represents the x and y intercepts?

umka21 [38]

Answer:

You need to categorize this to the form y=mx+c / y=mx+b

So,

12y=y & 3x=x

(Just let me know if u need further explanation or if this wasn't the ans. u were looking for)

7 0

3 years ago

A group of students were doing a science experiment in which they measured wind speed and temperature. The first day the wind sp

Mama L [17]

So the difference of speed will be 25-17 = 8 mph the last one choice

hope helped

8 0

3 years ago

Given rectangles LMNO and PQRS, which statement explains a way to determine if the two figures are similar?

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Definition:</u> Two rectangles are similar when they have corresponding sides proportional are proportional by dilation.

For example, rectangles with sides 3 cm, 4cm and 6 cm, 8 cm are similar, but rectangles with sides 3 cm, 4 cm and 6 cm, 10 cm are nor similar.

Since all angles in rectangle are always right angles, then options A and C are false (in terms of your question).

Option D is false too, because translation doesn't change the length, and in this case two rectangles are congruent.

Option B is true according to definition.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Use cramers rule to solve each system of equations :

Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

just follow the rules

Step-by-step explanation:

Cramer's rule applies to the case where the coefficient determinant is nonzero. ... A simple example where all determinants vanish (equal zero) but the system is still incompatible is the 3×3 system x+y+z=1, x+y+z=2, x+y+z=3.

Write the system as a matrix equation. ...

Create the inverse of the coefficient matrix out of the matrix equation. ...

Multiply the inverse of the coefficient matrix in the front on both sides of the equation. ...

Cancel the matrix on the left and multiply the matrices on the right.

5 0

3 years ago

Tain has a great literary tradition that spans centuries. One might assume, then, that Britons read more than citizens of other

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

$z=3.02$

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

The p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=0.86*1004$ represent the number of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$X_{2}=0.81*1009$ represent the number of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

$n_{1}=1004$ sample of Gallup selected

$n_{2}=1009$ sample of Britons selected

$p_{1}=0.86$ represent the proportion of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$p_{2}=0.81$ represent the proportion of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion for men with red/green color blindness is a higher than the rate for women , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{0.81+0.86}{2}=0.835$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.86-0.81}{\sqrt{0.835(1-0.835)(\frac{1}{1004}+\frac{1}{1009})}}=3.02$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

5 0

3 years ago