Circular questions are designed to de-centre clients by orienting them toward seeing themselves in a relational context and seeing that context from the perspectives of other family members.
<h3>What is
Circular questions?</h3>
In order to "encourage participants in a discourse to address relational aspects of the topic being investigated," circular questioning is a strategy used in systemic family therapy.
Circular questioning is a technique used by therapists to assist individuals, couples, and families in exploring new or alternative ideas and possibilities as well as other people's points of view.
A circular inquiry must possess one or more of the qualities listed below. They ought to:
- Describe the issue the family is facing.
- Ask for feedback that illustrates how circumstances have evolved over time (temporal questions)
- Encourage thought on how a third person might be impacted by the interactions of two family members (triadic questions)
- Include hypotheticals that challenge the family to behave differently (interventive questions)
To learn more about therapy visit:
brainly.com/question/12368886
#SPJ4
Australian Voting or Secret ballot voting. Thats what is was called
Answer:
people who look at the world as a perspective can be able to tell you that people from all around the world have their own unique way of things such as working farming kid playing or what ever they do its based off of how people or even all cultural thing have in common is about the fact that the world has soo much cool things/places for other people or countries to come to and check out to see what was build on earth
Explanation:
The Green Party candidate Ralph Nader (in)famously is part of the 2000 election because many people think that he siphoned votes from the Democrat candidate (Al Gore) which may have been a factor in Gore's defeat.
Here's a simplified view of what I mean. Let's say there are 100 people total. Now let's say the election is very close at 50 50. If any one person changes their vote, then the winner is decided. If a third party enters the race, then one of the original candidates will have their vote split. If Gore had 50 votes, but then lost say 20 of them to Nader, then he'll be left with 30 after all is said and done. Bush will still have 50 votes and this leads him to win the election.
Note: Gore won the popular vote, but lost the electoral college. The electoral college is the true deciding body that determines the president.
So based on the second paragraph, that's just one simplified example of how a third party effectively "spoils" the race. Of course, many could easily argue that a third party (or many more parties) is actually a good thing because it encourages many voices to join the political arena. Those advocates would say that having 2 parties leads to stagnation and lack of growth, not to mention lack of representation of everyone.
In short, many people think the third party candidate Ralph Nader redirected votes away from Al Gore which may have cost him the election. However, there may be other factors that contributed.