Answer:The public forum doctrine
Explanation:The public forum doctrine is a tool used in First Amendment jurisprudence which is used as a constitution that define speech restrictions but it also gives permission to a group to have a rally in a particular property or engage in whatever activity in a particular property.
Traditional Public Forums
- These forums includes public parks , sidewalks and areas that are open for political speech and debate , these are the areas in which people get protected under the First Amendment protection. The government under the public forum doctrine is accepted not to discriminate against any speakers irrespective of their views but should provide protection with only stipulated restricted in their speech.
Answer:
First thing, farming technology is less or even not available in context of nepal compare to other country.So they have to use traditional method which is time consuming and more effort and labour work
Another is farmer have to sale there crops in less price to seller because farmer don't have any facility (mostly farmer are uneducated so they don't know about marketting) that is why there gain is less then there efforts
Answer:
The answer is <u>D</u>.
Explanation:
<u>A long island that runs </u><em><u>parallel</u></em><u> to a coastline and </u><em><u>protects</u></em><u> the mainland from</u><em><u> erosion and storms.</u></em>
Answer:
King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella are guilty because they could have told Columbus no when he sent a letter requesting more support. Instead they continued to fund his expedition, encouraging his action, in the hope of getting more gold and slaves as Columbus promised. The King and Queen just wanted to be more rich and powerful, without their monetary support Columbus would not have been able to continue his expeditions. In addition, the King and Queen did not care about the Taínos’ lives because some of them refused to convert to Christianity. In Spain the King and Queen persecuted anyone who did not convert to Christianity and they encouraged this same method in the Caribbean toward the Taínos .
Explanation:
Have a nice day and good luck :)
the answer is: The neutral stimulus causes no response.
Without being paired by any situation, neutral stimulus would not mean anything to the subjects. Because of this , the subjects would normally just ignore the neutral stimulus every time they face it.
But, when the neutral stimulus is paired with a certain situation (such as ringing a bell before giving foods to dogs), the dogs will associate the neutral stimulus with the positive reinforcement. To the point where the neutral stimulus transformed into a conditioned stimulus, which make the dogs'mouth to start watering every time they hear the bell.