Single women in Puritan society had a very low social status and did not have much influence in society, but they were seen as very innocent, pure and credible people, since they were not married and had not been "corrupted". This is because, single women, in Puritan society, were considered children and therefore shared the same innocence, until they entered adulthood, where they would get married and leave the status of a child and, consequently, the status of incocence. Women prostitutes were also not considered innocent and did not deserve to be heard because of their sinful nature.
In "The crucible" the girls who started the accusations, mainly Abigail, were single and that's why nobody believed they were lying. Abigail used her reputation as an "innocent" to accuse all the people she believed should get out of her way, as no one knew she was Proctor's lover, her words were easily accepted by everyone.
That question is meant for you to give your opinion and state what has been the biggest influence in your life. I can't answer that for you.
At the end of the poem, hope is lost too soon, before the time is right.
We can reach this conclusion because:
- The poem is a great analogy about communism's invasion of Vietnam.
- In the poem, hope is represented by the papaya, which is not ripe enough to be picked.
- Some people want to cut the papaya, even before the right time, to prevent the communists from taking it.
- However, others feel that papaya should be cut when it is fully ripe, as everyone deserves it, including children.
- However, the papaya is cut early in a sad and melancholy way, as it is not ready to be eaten.
In that case, we can conclude that just like the papaya in the poem, some people cut hope out of their hearts very quickly towards the fight against communism and ended up leaving Vietnam too soon, before the right time, which was a sad and melancholic situation.
More information:
brainly.com/question/24742609?referrer=searchResults
I think: it creates a rhythmic pattern..
Answer:
Explanation:
This would depend on which side you are on, so if you are on the side allowing students to text at school, you can say it opens resources for students as well as a source of communication. However, personally I think that the argument that students shouldn't text would be easier because it has more evidence. You can say students can cheat, they can get distracted which will lead to bad grades etc
