Answer:Emily Durkheim
Explanation:
Functions of Deviance
Durkheim argued that deviance is somehow crucial in maintaining social stability. He suggested four particular things for which deviance is a vital.
1) Affirmation of cultural values and norms : He states that when people get punished for their deviance behavior it indicates to others what values and norms are acceptable within society. When a person is sent to prison enforces the idea that culturally stealing isn't acceptable. It defines a line on what is a norm and what isn't.
2)Clear definition of what is right and wrong: Punishment of a deviant behavior makes it clear to everyone which behavior they should pursue and which they should pursue. They also know clearly what is tolerable and what isn't
3) Unification of others in society: Grief and shock according to Durkheim can bring people together as they console each other and assist each other get through tough situations.
4) Promoting social change: it can even affect dominant society in evaluating what ither norms and values are there .
One true two false hope it helped
Answer:
That statement is false
Explanation:
It's the other way around. Their research shows that when the canadians put in the same situation, their judgement regarding acts of violence actually similar and consistent with the judgement made by the americans.
(this research finding is a little bit surprising because Canadians are more well known to have a more polite and gentle culture)
In general , their judgement regarding acts of violence can be influenced by their primal human instincts.
For example, the research showed that:
- both canadians and Americans overwhelmingly approved that acts of violence are justifiable if being done toward people who are broken into their house.
- Both Canadians and Americans overwhelmingly disapproved of acts of violence toward group of protesters.
The Gettysburg address was not eloquent. It was a three minute speech given by Abraham Lincoln.
Answer:
If a product is bulky or heavy, transportation costs increase, and unless the product has an extremely high value-to-weight ratio, the LEAST effective strategy would be a. exporting.
Explanation:
If the cost of transporting the product to another country is too high because of its weight, exporting it may not be a good idea since the product would become less profitable and thus the manufacturer could not compensate for its cost of production, making the company lose money.
