Answer:
D.
Explanation:
An implied power can be described as those powers which does not exist in the Constitution of the United States but expressly stated due to similar powers enjoyed by the Congress.
When the framers of the Constitution were drafting the document they had in mind that the needs of people will grow with the growing nation, so in Article I they gave the Congress right to excercise the power under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause.'
So, an example of implied power from the given options would be D. Congress have right to use implied power to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays. Therefore, option D is correct.
Answer:
"The relationship between lobbyists and lawmakers is complicated. On one hand, lobbyists pursue relationships with lawmakers in order to shape legislation so that it benefits clients who would be affected by new laws or regulations. On the other hand, lobbyists are frequently targeted by lawmakers as sources of campaign money, which the lobbyists feel beholden to give to improve their clients' prospects of success. "
Explanation:
The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.
About Equal Protection Clause
The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances. Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.
To know more about Baker v. Carr:
brainly.com/question/29398317
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes, indeed. Careful driving (ie low travelling speeds) helps reduce the risk of casualties.
People should not pay taxes if they disagree with how the government is spending their money but in doing so it breaks the social contract described by many thinkers during the period of Enlightenment. In the case of wishing to not pay taxes, no government services should be available to the person, nor should they be able to function within the society where others are paying taxes. If one wishes to live their own life not paying taxes and not hurting anyway, there is no ethical or moral reason for them not to do such. However it is important to understand there is no middle ground, not paying taxes and still benefitting from a society.
