1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
guapka [62]
3 years ago
7

From 1948 to 2003 the United States experienced an average real GDP growth rate of 3.5 percent and Guatemala had an average real

GDP growth rate of 3.6 percent from 1993 to 2003. Can we say that Guatemala's standard of living grew more than the United States' standard of living from 1993 to 2003
Business
2 answers:
Gekata [30.6K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

No, and that statement is probably false.

Explanation:

Generally when we want to compare the standard of living of country  to another country, we must measure real GDP per capita which accounts for both changes in the GDP and changes in the country's total population. Currently some organizations use the purchase power parity (PPP) to better compare the nominal GPD per capita since the PPP tries to account for differences in domestic prices of goods between countries. E.g. a house in the US is worth at least 10 houses in Guatemala, so a citizen of Guatemala needs a much smaller amount of money to purchase a house.

There is also a statistical comparison error, since one measurement includes 10 years, while the other includes 55 years. If you want to compare both economies you would either use information regarding the American economy during 1993-2003, or you would need information regarding the economy of Guatemala during 1948-2003.

Third but not least, countries that are very poor tend to grow at higher rates than rich countries, and the US is the richest country in the world while Guatemala is one of the poorest countries. For instance, in 2019, the size of the US economy was $21,427,100 million, while the size of the economy of Guatemala was $81,318 million. A 1% increase in the American economy represents a 263% increase in the economy of Guatemala. Even though poor economies grow at higher rates, it doesn't mean that the change is significant enough to improve their standard of living.

Luda [366]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No, we can’t say

Explanation:

In this question, we are asked to decide if we can say that Guatemala’s standard of living grew more than that of the US’ standard of living between the years 1993 and 2003 given the pointers in the question.

We cannot say that this is correct because of the following reasons;

As observed from the question, the US growth rate was calculated between the years 1948-2003, which is indicative of a 55 year span. Now, comparing this with that of Guatemala, we can see that the span here is just 10 years I.e from 1993 to 2003.

Also, we were not provided with the population growth rate in both countries and this makes it difficult to judge which of the two countries have a better growth in terms of standard of living

You might be interested in
An agent that represents a cluster of manufacturers, e-tailers, and content providers organized around a life event or major ass
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

correct answer is Metamediary

Explanation:

solution  

answer is  Metamediary because Metamediary is a person or a business that helps to the consumer for obtaining the goods and service by the supplier within the metamarket  

and it also offers you to service like as advice of business and financing and provide content to the organized in any asset  

so here the correct answer is Metamediary

6 0
3 years ago
The PRIMARY function of banks in the United States is to a) print money b) make banking laws c) build homes and businesses d) pr
Jobisdone [24]
Im pretty sure its D.

it sounds right
:)


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dane is a stockholder in smallworld, inc., a c corporation that manufactures amusement park rides. the company recently lost a m
Georgia [21]
Dane and the other stockholders will lose their investments but nothing else. Because Dane and others are stockholders in this company, they will lose the money that they had invested in the company and they will no longer receive any dividend from the company again because the company has gone bankrupt. Dane and others are not liable for other debts that had been acquired by the company. 
7 0
3 years ago
2. What are the advantages of utilizing a targeted marketing strategy?
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

Explanation:

Target marketing is a way of focusing your advert on specific people, location, age group, interest, in order to have a maximum yield.when utilizing target marketing strategy, there are a lot of advantages that are attached to it as discussed below;

  1. Precise advertisement ; when you have a target market you are aiming at you will not waste your energy in running numerous advertisements to the target area you only advertise what they need. e.g if a certain area in London demands for ladies bags so often and you make both female bags and male bags, your advert will definitely be on the bags that are demanded more often.
  2. It saves cost ; cost of running advert for so many goods and services will be reduced because you already know your target customers you only advertise what they needed with little money and more result.
  3. Loyalty; when you channel your strength in an area of target you become more reliable and trustworthy and you start to gain loyalty from your existing customers and referrals from them.
  4. Increased customer base your customer base will increase because your customer base has friends and family so they introduce you to them and from there your customer base increases.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Bill wants to give Maria a $590,000 gift in two years. If money is worth 12% compounded semiannually, what is Maria's gift worth
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

the present value is $467,335.2613

Explanation:

The computation of the value worth today is shown below:

= Amount in two years ÷ (1 + rate of interest)^number of years

= $590,000 ÷ (1 + 12% ÷ 2)^2×2

= $590,000 ÷ 1.06^4

= $590,000 ÷ 1.26247696

= $467,335.2613

Hence, the present value is $467,335.2613

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered  

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If someone dies without a will, who handles the distribution of the person’s estate?
    9·1 answer
  • What is a reason why someone would use a secured credit card?
    8·1 answer
  • The best time to acquire technological literacy is before you have to apply for a job because ________.
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following would not be included in calculating the incremental cash flow for a project? The firm expects sales of t
    5·1 answer
  • your grandmother tells you a dollar doesn't go as far as it use to. she says the "purchasing power" of a dollar is much less tha
    13·1 answer
  • Please subscribe to my mom channel please<br><br>I need 100 subscribe​​
    5·2 answers
  • Pr 6-3a weighted average cost method with perpetual inventory
    8·1 answer
  • The chart shows a sample budget.
    12·2 answers
  • In markets where the government imposes an excise tax on unit sales, it also has a tendency to dabble with restrictions on adver
    5·1 answer
  • Allan borrowed $4200 from his father to buy a car. He repaid him after 4 months with interest of 7% per year. Find the total amo
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!