Complete Question
The diagram for this question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
a E =
b E =
c E = 0 N/C
d 
e 
f V = 
g 
h 
i 
Explanation:
From the question we are given that
The first charge 
The second charge 
The first radius 
The second radius 

And ![Potential \ Difference = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1 }{r}+\frac{q_2}{R_2} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Potential%20%5C%20Difference%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%20%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%20%7D%7Br%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%5D)
The objective is to obtain the the magnitude of electric for different cases
And the potential difference for other cases
Considering a
r = 4.00 m


Considering b

This implies that the electric field would be

This because it the electric filed of the charge which is below it in distance that it would feel

= 
Considering c
r = 0.200 m
=> 
The electric field = 0
This is because the both charge are above it in terms of distance so it wont feel the effect of their electric field
Considering d
r = 4.00 m
=> 
Now the potential difference is

This so because the distance between the charge we are considering is further than the two charges given
Considering e
r = 1.00 m 
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} \frac{1.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 26.79 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2026.79%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering f

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.700} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 34.67 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.700%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2034.67%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering g

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering h

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering i

![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be 400 cm.
The given parameters:
- <em>Length of the string, L = 100 cm</em>
<em />
The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves is calculated as follows;

for first mode: n = 1

for second mode: n = 2

For the third mode: n = 3

For fourth mode: n = 4

Thus, we can conclude that, the wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be 400 cm.
The complete question is below:
A string of length 100 cm is held fixed at both ends and vibrates in a standing wave pattern. The wavelengths of the constituent travelling waves CANNOT be:
A. 400 cm
B. 200 cm
C. 100 cm
D. 67 cm
E. 50 cm
Learn more about wavelengths of travelling waves here: brainly.com/question/19249186
<em>The gravitational force between two objects is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the two objects.</em>
The gravitational force between two objects is proportional to the product of the masses of the two objects.
The gravitational force between two objects is proportional to the square of the distance between the two objects. <em> no</em>
The gravitational force between two objects is inversely proportional to the distance between the two objects. <em> no</em>
The gravitational force between two objects is proportional to the distance between the two objects. <em> no</em>
The gravitational force between two objects is inversely proportional to the product of the masses of the two objects. <em> no</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
cSep 20, 2010
well, since player b is obviously inadequate at athletics, it shows that player b is a woman, and because of this, she would not be able to hit the ball. The magnitude of the initial velocity would therefore be zero.
Anonymous
Sep 20, 2010
First you need to solve for time by using
d=(1/2)(a)(t^2)+(vi)t
1m=(1/2)(9.8)t^2 vertical initial velocity is 0m/s
t=.45 sec
Then you find the horizontal distance traveled by using
v=d/t
1.3m/s=d/.54sec
d=.585m
Then you need to find the time of player B by using
d=(1/2)(a)(t^2)+(vi)t
1.8m=(1/2)(9.8)(t^2) vertical initial velocity is 0
t=.61 sec
Finally to find player Bs initial horizontal velocity you use the horizontal equation
v=d/t
v=.585m/.61 sec
so v=.959m/s
Answer:
(A) The period of its rotation is 0.5 s (2) The frequency of its rotation is 2 Hz.
Explanation:
Given that,
a ball is spun around in circular motion such that it completes 50 rotations in 25 s.
(1). Let T be the period of its rotation. It can be calculated as follows :

(2). Let f be the frequency of its rotation. It can be defined as the number of rotations per unit time. So,

Hence, this is the required solution.