Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
Answer: Example of Lori is best for altruistic personality description
Explanation:
Altruistic personality is the personality that consists emotional responses along with cognitive response . They tend to follow social norms as being their responsibility and show empathy towards other in different situations.
According to the question,Lori is indulged in act of sympathy and empathy by running women shelter and funding it through charity in emotional and cognitive manner.
Other options are incorrect because Cassie is doing general help for her sister, Jack is saving live and it not example of cognitive response and Scott is performing helping act to attain something in exchange.
Answer:
[federal] U.S. District Court .
Explanation:
Answer:
Due to mutation.
Explanation:
Due to mutation, the rice plants are able to produce gluten like other grain crops such as wheat etc. In this mutation, change occurs in a DNA sequence of the rice plant by exposing the plant to ionized radiation. Due to this radiation, change occurs in the DNA of rice plant and the rice plant is able to produce gluten like wheat plant. So mutation is a very useful method for producing substances which a plant can't produce in its normal condition.
The 9th Amendment states that: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
It is, in effect, that even there are rights other than just the ones listed in the Bill of Rights and they can't be violated either.
