Motion because, those are the rules of conversion.
False , (No) because if its a regular floor it will more likely break because of the flat surface but if it is concrete then it has more of a chance because it has edges and dents which will help prevent it from breaking.
Answer:
It would be (a)
Explanation:
A theory is something that can be proved through rigorous and repeated experimentation, while choice (b) sounds tempting i believe it fails at the fact that it says that a theory is an "agreement", sure an agreement could be reached by while trained scientists but that does not necessarily mean that what the scientists agree upon is rigorously tested and repeatable, and so therefore cannot be assumed
That is what I think
Hope this helps :)
(a) Differentiate the position vector to get the velocity vector:
<em>r</em><em>(t)</em> = (3.00 m/s) <em>t</em> <em>i</em> - (4.00 m/s²) <em>t</em>² <em>j</em> + (2.00 m) <em>k</em>
<em>v</em><em>(t)</em> = d<em>r</em>/d<em>t</em> = (3.00 m/s) <em>i</em> - (8.00 m/s²) <em>t</em> <em>j</em>
<em></em>
(b) The velocity at <em>t</em> = 2.00 s is
<em>v</em> (2.00 s) = (3.00 m/s) <em>i</em> - (16.0 m/s) <em>j</em>
<em></em>
(c) Compute the electron's position at <em>t</em> = 2.00 s:
<em>r</em> (2.00 s) = (6.00 m) <em>i</em> - (16.0 m) <em>j</em> + (2.00 m) <em>k</em>
The electron's distance from the origin at <em>t</em> = 2.00 is the magnitude of this vector:
||<em>r</em> (2.00 s)|| = √((6.00 m)² + (-16.0 m)² + (2.00 m)²) = 2 √74 m ≈ 17.2 m
(d) In the <em>x</em>-<em>y</em> plane, the velocity vector at <em>t</em> = 2.00 s makes an angle <em>θ</em> with the positive <em>x</em>-axis such that
tan(<em>θ</em>) = (-16.0 m/s) / (3.00 m/s) ==> <em>θ</em> ≈ -79.4º
or an angle of about 360º + <em>θ</em> ≈ 281º in the counter-clockwise direction.
B.) <span>The amp is the unit for "Current"
Hope this helps!</span>
