A. <span>Lewis and Clark explored the Louisiana Territory and kept detailed records of their findings. </span>
The United States government has many purposes including:
A) Protecting the rights of citizens.
B) Creating laws for citizens to follow.
C) Deciding how to use tax money.
Further Explanation:
The United States government has many different responsibilities. These responsibilities are divided among the three different branches of the federal government. This includes the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Ultimately, these three different branches work together to protect the rights of citizens and to develop institutions that allow for a safe and organized society. Each of the aforementioned branches has a different set of responsibilities in this system.
The responsibilities designated to each branch were an important part in creating our current US Constitution. The goal of the founding fathers was to create a system in which no one branch of the federal government had too much power.
Learn More:
Power of the different branches within the federal government - brainly.com/question/11337967
Key Details:
Topic: American History, American Government
Grade Level: 7-12
Keywords: US government, federal government, rights
<u>Answer:</u>
The fundamental doctrines of early Buddhism, stay regular to all Buddhism, incorporate the four respectable realities. With this clear perspective on circumstances and logical results, Buddhism acknowledges the container Indian presupposition of samsara, in which living creatures are caught in a consistent cycle of birth-and-passing, with force to resurrection gave by one's past physical and mental activities.
Lay practices, for example, the love of stupas (entombment hills containing relics) originated before Buddhism and offered to ascend to later formal and respectful methods.
The Salt March on March 12, 1930
A demonstrator offers a flower to military police at a National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam-sponsored protest in Arlington, Virginia, on October 21, 1967
A "No NATO" protester in Chicago, 2012Nonviolent resistance (NVR or nonviolent action) is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, or other methods, while being nonviolent. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group. It is largely but wrongly taken as synonymous with civil resistance. Each of these terms—nonviolent resistance and civil resistance—has its distinct merits and also quite different connotations and commitments.
Major nonviolent resistance advocates include Mahatma Gandhi, Henry David Thoreau, Te Whiti o Rongomai, Tohu Kākahi, Leo Tolstoy, Alice Paul, Martin Luther King, Jr, James Bevel, Václav Havel, Andrei Sakharov, Lech Wałęsa, Gene Sharp, and many others. There are hundreds of books and papers on the subject—see Further reading below.
From 1966 to 1999, nonviolent civic resistance played a critical role in fifty of sixty-seven transitions from authoritarianism.[1] Recently, nonviolent resistance has led to the Rose Revolution in Georgia and the Orange Revolution in Ukraine. Current nonviolent resistance includes the Jeans Revolution in Belarus, the "Jasmine" Revolution in Tunisia, and the fight of the Cuban dissidents. Many movements which promote philosophies of nonviolence or pacifism have pragmatically adopted the methods of nonviolent action as an effective way to achieve social or political goals. They employ nonviolent resistance tactics such as: information warfare, picketing, marches, vigils, leafletting, samizdat, magnitizdat, satyagraha, protest art, protest music and poetry, community education and consciousness raising, lobbying, tax resistance, civil disobedience, boycotts or sanctions, legal/diplomatic wrestling, underground railroads, principled refusal of awards/honors, and general strikes. Nonviolent action differs from pacifism by potentially being proactive and interventionist.
A great deal of work has addressed the factors that lead to violent mobilization, but less attention has been paid to understanding why disputes become violent or nonviolent, comparing these two as strategic choices relative to conventional politics.[2]
Contents 1 History of nonviolent resistance2 See also2.1 Documentaries2.2 Organizations and people
