Answer:
The best statement which describe Javier's research question is:
O. It is specific but not too narrow, and is phrased to allow for an in-depth response.
Explanation:
From the question which was asked by Javier, we could see that, he asked a specific question in his question to obtain the positive or negative effect og life in Japan as a result of Treaty of San Francisco.
On the other-hand, it is not too narrow due to the fact that, the effect could range from education, to history or from military hardware to medical researches. <em>It is phrased to allow for in-depth response which would take up all the time in the history class while not providing opportunities for all students to contribute within the allocated time frame. </em>
Hello. You did not show the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to know the inference that the author made with the reading of the text. However, an inference is a conclusion, which can only be established through the analysis of facts and arguments, which trigger a conclusion, an opinion on the subject. In this case, to answer your question, you should look at how the author's arguments about the students' return lead to a conclusion that must be made on this subject.
