Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as:
(i.e. there is no difference between the SAT score for students in both locations)
(i.e. there is a difference between the SAT score for students in both locations)
The test statistics using the students' t-test for the two-samples; we have:






t = 2.06
degree of freedom = (
) -2
degree of freedom = (45+38) -2
degree of freedom = 81
Using the level of significance of 0.05
Since the test is two-tailed at the degree of freedom 81 and t = 2.06
The p-value = 0.0426
Decision rule: To reject
if the p-value is less than the significance level
Conclusion: We reject the
, thus, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the SAT math score for students in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Evaluate g(- 4) and f(- 4) by substituting x = - 4 into g(x) and f(x), that is
f(- 4) = - 10(- 4) + 9 = 40 + 9 = 49
g(- 4) = (- 4)² + 12 = 16 + 12 = 28
Then
=
= 
Only one line can pass through 2 points.
Answer:
-x¹⁴ / 5040
-½ < x < ½
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = e^(-x²)
The Taylor series for eˣ centered at 0 is:
eˣ = ∑ (1/n!) xⁿ
Substitute -x²:
e^(-x²) = ∑ (1/n!) (-x²)ⁿ
e^(-x²) = ∑ (1/n!) (-1)ⁿ x²ⁿ
The 14th degree term occurs at n=7.
(1/7!) (-1)⁷ x¹⁴
-x¹⁴ / 5040
ln(1 + x) = ∑ₙ₌₁°° (-1)ⁿ⁺¹ xⁿ / n
If we substitute 4x²:
ln(1 + 4x²) = ∑ₙ₌₁°° (-1)ⁿ⁺¹ (4x²)ⁿ / n
Using ratio test:
lim(n→∞)│aₙ₊₁ / aₙ│< 1
lim(n→∞)│[(-1)ⁿ⁺² (4x²)ⁿ⁺¹ / (n+1)] / [(-1)ⁿ⁺¹ (4x²)ⁿ / n]│< 1
lim(n→∞)│-1 (4x²) n / (n+1)│< 1
4x² < 1
x² < ¼
-½ < x < ½
For this case we have that by definition, the perimeter of the rectangle is given by:

Where:
W: Is the width of the rectangle
L: is the length of the rectangle
According to the data we have:

Substituting:

So, the width of the rectangle is 9 inches

So, the length of the rectangle is 15 inches
Answer:
the width of the rectangle is 9 inches
the length of the rectangle is 15 inches