The answer would be: Natural, Rate
Extinction can be considered a natural process because it will happen even without human's intervention.
As a human, we could only help to accelerate or decelerate the speed of extinction, for example hunting lions irresponsibly will accelerate the speed of extinction while creating a conservation will decelerate it
the answer is communist, in which one party holds total authority over its country and people
Answer:
Fluid intelligence
Explanation:
Fluid intelligence is that ability of an individual to reason in a unique way or reason abstractly to or and solve a problem.
It has been researched or proved that, this fluid intelligence is independent of learning, education or experience.
In this case, Barry will only relies on his fluid intelligence to solve the abstract word that he has never seen before. This is because, he has no experience about it and has not been taught before. So it is only his fluid intelligence that can be used.
Answer:
E) a bio-psycho-social perspective
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) the DSM-IV.
B) the medical model.
C) linkage analysis.
D) the legal insanity defense.
E) a bio-psycho-social perspective.
People around the world experience the same diseases differently. This is not the result of differences in biology or in the disease itself. Instead, this stems from differences in culture and in the social understanding of diseases. As this deeply influences a person's experiences with a disease, it is necessary to take psychological and social understandings of a disease into account when treating someone who suffers from them. This is known as the a bio-psycho-social perspective.
Answer:
Using the cost-benefit analysis table to answer the question: should Mis. Baxter allow her students to take an open-book test the best option to fill the blank pace is: Mrs. Baxter may have to reteach the material.
Explanation:
First of all, let's analyze the context and the answers.
In this case, let's consider the first option. It doesn't matter if the students obtain better results if she instead applied a closed-book test. Increasing the notes the students would obtain wouldn't mean they learned the correct answer. But that they know how to find information. So it is the most logical considering the cost-benefit analysis.
The second option says that Mrs. Baxter wouldn't need to proctor the exam. But just because it is an open book test doesn't mean students won't feel insecure about their answers and won't copy from classmates, so it's wrong.
Parents may be happier with grades. This could be a good choice but may is such an ambiguous answer that doesn't say anything. It is a tricky answer we have a 50% chance they would be happier with nice grades, but if asked her the reason they wouldn't be happy. So, it's wrong because, in the end, she didn't test their knowledge.
Fourth option Parents will encourage children to study. They could provide them reinforcement for good performance but not encourage them. They would encourage them if they performed badly. Also if they knew how they obtained it, they would definitely know they were not tested and would have a reason to be rewarded. So it is also wrong.