Answer:
b. false
Explanation:
Generally, this statement is incorrect because the company should be viewed as an ongoing company and the use of debt (or equity) to fund a given project will change the capital structure and this factor should determine the cost of capital on all projects on the target capital structure. "Prague Ekt financing "may be used and in particular the status of the project will be considered. It is a very specific situation, however, it" usually "is not.
Answer:
Total equivalent units= 11,890
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Assembly Department completes 10,200 gadgets and transfers them to Finished Goods Inventory.
The Assembly Department has 2,600 gadgets in the process that are 65% complete for conversion.
<u>To calculate the equivalent units, we need to multiply the % complete for the number of units started:</u>
Units completed= 10,200
Units in ending inventory= 2,600*0.65= 1,690
Total equivalent units= 11,890
The inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced from the information given.
In this case, the inference illustrates that the true statement about comparative intelligence is that it compares a plantiffs fault with a defendant's and reduces the damage award proportionally.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Answer: corporate social responsibility practice
Explanation:
Corporate social responsibility occurs when organizations contribute to societal goals by supporting practices that are ethically oriented and have a positive effect on the economy.
Since Patagonia donates at least 1% of profits to support environmental causes and is contributing positively to the economy, then Patagonia is practicing corporate social responsibility practices.
Answer:
Jun's pressure and influence has invalidated Mika's consent.
Explanation:
By threatening Mika with prosecution if she doesn't set a discount for the sale of her house on the grounds of her debt to her, she has influenced Jun's consent or rather coerced it and therefore Mika's consent is invalidated in the agreement. Consent is free under law if contract and should be given under undue influence, duress or any other vitiating factor that will render the contract null and void such as the example above
