Answer:
a. 1
Explanation:
Rules-based monetary policy advocats would most likely set the annual money supply growth rate at 1%. The money supply refers to the total value of money that is available in an economy at a particular point in time. This usually includes currency in circulation as well as demand deposits. However, the exact definition of "money supply" can vary depending on the central bank that manages it.
Answer:
C Protection against inflation
Explanation:
As we know that there are three functions of money i.e.
1. Unit of account
2. Store of value
3. Medium of exchange
There is only 3 functions of money that are shown above
So the protection against inflation would not be considered for the same
And, these 3 would represent the functions of money and can be treated as the unit of account, store of value and the medium of exchange
Hence, the option c is correct
Answer:
$150
Explanation:
Calculation to determine How much does the investor gain or lose if the oil price at the end of the contract equals $14.0
Using this formula
Gain or Loss =(Futures price- Ending contract)*Contract size
Let plug in the formula
Gain or Loss=$15.5 per barrel- $14.0* 100 barrels
Gain or Loss=$1.5*100
Gain or Loss=$150
Therefore How much does the investor gain or lose if the oil price at the end of the contract equals $14.0 will be $150
Answer:
Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the term used to define the ability of an individual, firm or country to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than that if it’s competitors or trade partners. Opportunity cost is the benefit lost from the second best alternative.
When a country can produce a product more efficiently (i.e maximum output using minimum resources) than that of its trade partners, it is known as that it has absolute advantage in that product. India tends to have absolute advantage in both business processes outsourcing as well as producing agricultural commodities as it is mentioned that it can produce both of these more efficiently than the United States.
However, although it has absolute advantage in both, it is still less efficient in producing agricultural commodities when compared to business process outsourcing. In other words, if it attempts to produce agricultural commodities in-house, the benefit lost from the second best alternative: business process outsourcing is high. The opportunity cost is higher when it produces agricultural commodities than it is when it does business process outsourcing. Hence, due to the law of comparative advantage, it chooses to specialize in business process outsourcing and imports agricultural commodities.
